When it comes to the supposed admitting to being over 18 at the locked down psych ward, I can’t help but think it went something like this: “Do you want to get out of here? Well you can’t leave until you accept reality. We know you are over 18. You have to acknowledge this before you can be...
Yes divorce records are public. How much is available on line, however, varies dramatically. Sometimes you see nothing on line unless it’s appealed to a higher court (appellate). Sometimes, like with Indiana, you can see the motions filed and a short summary (follow this link and click the...
We know because Kristine told us. She said it was their first night at home and she gave her a bath. Michael also told Inside Edition that Kristine called him into the bathroom and said “LOOK!!!”
Supposedly Natalia is so crafty, but she didn’t refuse Kristine giving her a bath? She couldn’t conceal a supposed menstral cycle? That’s simply not believable
The Barnetts left for Canada in July 2013. Michael returned by February 2014 as evidenced by his filing for divorce with an Indiana address, while Kristine’s was still Ontario CA
When I was evaluating her statements, I was thinking of the son’s in terms of their ages in 2013 because it sounded like she was recounting what she said to Natalia in 2013. But her statement was made in September 2019. So, I CONCEDE THIS POINT. Her statement could be true for her eldest at a...
3 sons, Jacob, Wesley, Ethan.
Jacob is currently 21. He was born in May 1998. I extrapolated this from a Facebook post on Jacob’s Facebook from May 2018 that said Jacob just turned 20.
Ethan is approximately 16. I extrapolated this from Jacob’s Facebook, a post on Oct 23 2017 said “Ethan is...
What Kristine actually said, as quoted from Daily Mail, is: “She discontinued communication with me. What I did get was a letter in the mail stating that she had changed Michael from the beneficiary of her social security income to someone else”.
So actually Kristine did NOT say that she got a...
The exact quote from the Daily Mail Mother claims Ukrainian adopted daughter, 9, was 22 and had dwarfism | Daily Mail Online
“I will do one more year of financial aid, the exact same thing I AM DOING for all of my children” (emphasis mine)
By her own words she says “I am doing”. I cannot see...
Another thing Kristine said, about how she set Natalia up with rent etc and told her she was an adult now but Kristine would give her 1 more year of support, was that she was doing for her like she did for “all her children”. This is basically a lie. Why? Cause All Kristine’s other children (3...
Natalia would have been eligible for SSI or SSDI based upon her own income, not family income, which was Zero, starting at the age of 22. Kinda makes sense now that when they changed her age, it was to the age...wait for it...22! I’d bet money they applied ASAP after the court amended her birth...
I read that Natalia receives $722 per month social security income. I googled the address of her apartment and it currently rents for $450 per month. I don’t know the rent in 2013.
On the court website the eviction proceedings were filed 5-12-2014. The landlord had already regained possession...
I think Kristine’s statement about the SS and Michael having been the beneficiary establishes that they were receiving her checks. The correct term for that is Representative Payee. However, this is not necessarily fraud. As long as the funds were used for Natalia, there is no fraud. Further...
I began to doubt Kristine when she spoke about how she helped Natalia get social security. In that very same interview she later went on to say how Natalia quit answering the phone and then she got a letter in the mail changing the beneficiary of the SS from Michael to someone else. This is a...
Linda-
Just as professionals did not conspire with Dee Dee Blanchard, no one conspired with the Barnetts. But I think she fooled them just as Dee Dee did about Gypsy
Linda-
I think if Kristine really loved Natalia as she claims, she would not be telling her private information to journalists. She is talking about extremely personal details about her vjay and her menstral cycle, for crying out loud. And why? Why not simply state-“A court of law in conjunction...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.