They searched a number of parks and open spaces at the start of the missing person investigation. All such parks were an obvious place to look in the absence of any evidence. It is merely coincidence (at least IMO) that Agnes Riley Gardens is almost directly opposite the location where it later...
I also noticed that in the BBC report yesterday on the murder charge. The suggestion that she might have returned home was reintroduced, but this could have been a mistake made in cobbling together an article containing a mixture of new and old information:
"Ms Everard was last seen walking...
Correct. It has been stated in many articles that he worked at the US embassy on 3 March (e.g. link below), finishing his shift at 8pm. But it will be interesting to see if this turns out to be incorrect.
Cop arrested in Sarah Everard case ‘spent day she vanished guarding US Embassy’
Cop...
Not that it's of any importance, but people wouldn't be confused if the police said they had found human remains. But what the initial statement said was that they had found 'what appear to be' human remains. That wording creates doubt. I'm aware of course of how common that wording has become...
I take your point. It could literally be anywhere in Kent, as far away as Dover or somewhere just over the border from Greater London, but not in Greater London. I'll be interested to see whereabouts it is if it's revealed, just out of curiosity.
I posted about this earlier today. My memory of reading the tweet and the response was that the police account asked for further communication through DMs, but that was incorrect. If a tweet is deleted, it shows, and there is no deleted tweet, so it was my mistake.
Not that it matters, but IMO if they said the arrests were made in Kent, they mean somewhere within the current boundaries of Kent, not somewhere that used to be in Kent but is now within a London borough.
I thought it was stated that the doorbell footage confirmed not only that it was her but also the direction she was walking in.
EDIT: Sorry, misread what you wrote. You're suggesting that she retraced her steps, before resuming her original direction, and was then captured on camera.
Sorry, but I don't see anything conclusive or even suggestive in these images. That's not to say that you are not on to something, but these images are too low-resolution. I just see blobs. A figure wearing a dark jacket, light-coloured shirt and dark trousers. Yes, I can zoom in but I still see...
Yes, I am someone who is the opposite: I never speak on the phone when out walking. But it is obvious from what I see when out walking that many people are engaged in phone conversations as they walk.
In my opinion, no. Most shops don't have public toilets. What seems most likely to me is that, despite Covid regulations, she would have used the toilet at her friend's house in Leathwaite Road. It's of course possible that she observed the regulations to the letter, but just seems unlikely to...
There is no trace on the location of the phone beyond Clarence Avenue area (which doesn't necessarily mean on Clarence Avenue itself). I don't know much about the tech but I assume that no trace can then be assumed to have specific causes.
That's true, although the assumption has always been that she was walking home, i.e. towards Brixton Hill/Tulse Hill. It's hard to imagine why she would turn around and return to Clapham Common voluntarily.
Incidentally, there was a weird tweet yesterday by somone claiming to have seen her by...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.