Search results

Who else should have been "investigated" that wasn't? In any investigation, they follow the evidence. They don't just select random people. In this particular case it led straight to SA. Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Do you have a source that confirms the nightstand was searched 8 times? Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Looks that way :thinking:

Madeleine is this the one you were referring to? I know with any phone I have had, if you don't save a message it auto deletes after a certain time.

It is in the article I posted earlier. It is also in the 91 page written decision. http://newstalk1130.iheart.com/onair/common-sense-central-37717/rebutting-the-ridiculous-brendan-dassey-decision-15050465/?desktop=true&desktopviewduration=86400 Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

I don't think you understand. It is Judge Duffin that cited the Villalpando case, not me. If you think it has nothing to do with it then tell it to the Judge LOL Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Judge Duffin, who overturned BD's conviction, cited the Villalpando case regarding false confessions, however, the 7th Circuit Judges disagreed and reinstated Villalpando's conviction. Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

To overturn the conviction. Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

The Judge cited this case in his decision. Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Yeah I seen that! Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

From the above article I posted. "Duffin here cites as his controlling precedent for this standard*United States v. Villalpando, a case the 7th Circuit decided in 2009. *In it, Christopher Villalpando, a 21 year-old college student who was on probation for drug violations was stopped by a...

I posted the article, if you wish not to read it that is your choice. Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Can't post a link to something that isn't there. If it was there, it wouldn't be hush hush. Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Was SD the attorney of the defendant when they cited it? Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Yes, I do feel confident. I was just posting one example. I wasn't insinuating this fact alone would see it reversed. Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

Well yes, in my opinion it does sound terrible but people are different I guess. BTW, do you have a link that states "they knew something shady was going on and they didn't care"? TIA Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk

I partly agree. I have seen it often on internet discussions about various cases. Some people target the poster rather than the post to derail the topic because they have been pi**ed off. Can't say I agree with "they just want SA to be guilty" though. That's like saying those who believe he is...

I didn't start that thread, Shadowraiths did! [emoji51] Sent from my SM-P550 using Tapatalk