Search results

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    I think some of this is contradictory to what Dr. Mambo testfied to. IIRC Dr. M said that he put ink on the cuts he made in autopsy so that you could tell cuts he made versus cuts made by dismemberment. Obviously there were no ink marks when arrived in NC because this witness was asked to try...
  2. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    Is there a point to this cross? Seems like a lot of rambling!
  3. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    Surely they will call the lead detective, Faulk.
  4. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    This testimony by Mr. Seargent is very, very favorable to LA and very compelling IMO!!
  5. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    I think the defense makes their client look worse by their cross. They are not going to trip up this witness!
  6. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    This should be a good day for the prosecution IMO!
  7. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    I think she got to his apartment between 5 & 6 and Chickfila drop off was around 9:20 but I could be wrong on this.
  8. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    Everyone that knew LA says she was looking forward to the custody hearing and was optimistic about her chances of getting custody, that she wouldn't have done anything to jeopardize her case. So, how in the world did GH get her to sign that document?
  9. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    It's a lady she knew from church who did Bible study with her and mentored her.
  10. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    Why did they not read the transcript of his Broomstick Rider out loud ? Even if they could prove the negative things he says in the email about LA are true, does that provide any justification for what was done to her? Please!
  11. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    I wonder if GH & AH could have bought ice on Thursday, the 14th at a random place that was never checked for video (gas station, etc) or even on the 15th on the way back from the Sheetz in Wilson. They could have kept the body iced down in the bathtub until they transferred it to the coolers.
  12. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    I missed the first part of today. Was no blood found on anything from the trash?
  13. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    If they bought trac phones to use, why was GH dumb enough to be using his regular cell phone in TX?
  14. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    Surely to goodness there is trace evidence on some of these items!!
  15. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    i think this just points to their cockiness in thinking the body would never be found. They had been in possession of her body for several days, imo, before they dumped this stuff and no one had come to investigate so they thought this stuff would be long gone before LE put it all together!
  16. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    I missed the chickfila video, my link wouldn't work when they first started back! Can't wait to hear lab test results on these items from the dumpster!
  17. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    I believe 8/26 is the date this trial started.
  18. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    Here is the link to the entire hearing from Aug. 16, 2013 http://media.wral.com:1935/vod/_definst_/mp4:wral/asset/news/2013/08/16/12784007/2013-08-16_11649-576x324-15-768.mp4/playlist.m3u8
  19. M

    GUILTY NC - Laura Ackerson, 27, Kinston, 13 July 2011 #3

    Thanks for posting the links! I do not know why they can't call KB. The motion was just about eliciting the statement on cross. Think defense was counting on them calling her as a witness. Think this motion put prosecution on notice of their intent so now prosecution is trying not to call her. IMO

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
162
Guests online
1,662
Total visitors
1,824

Forum statistics

Threads
605,971
Messages
18,196,124
Members
233,683
Latest member
MarthaMaude
Back
Top