Search results

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
  1. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #18

    I'm afraid but IMO we have all gone full circle here and there will be little that anyone can add at this stage given validation or accuracy of the information currently available. It would now seem that open public forums have been closed for various reasons. This will prevent / restrict the...
  2. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #18

    So what are we all doing now?
  3. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #18

    Is this thread currently active?
  4. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    IMO, no matter what has been said, I'm still not convinced that its impossible to leave HS without being seen on CCTV. In saying this it still remains that:- 1. Still in HS 2. Left on foot undetected 3. Left in vehicle We are NO further ahead and much more work / info is needed to bring this...
  5. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    If or when identified it would be well worth looking into if there is any connection.
  6. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    OMG,, The only facts are that he was last seen in HS, times changed and not verified, Initial CCTV with questionable time stamps, new images with NO time stamps. Where can we go with this ATM? So much conflicting information and MIT / MIS will be withholding loads more. IMO, best we can do is...
  7. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    Phone thrown in bin along with food wrappers,, hence the route it travelled?
  8. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    Sorry, I was just going by press release and wasn't aware. I wonder if there was a reason for this?
  9. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    It's all part of the process and areas will need to be cleared before moving forward. Why look further afield when the answer may be on your doorstep?
  10. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    And with Scotland Yard and MIS now involved, I would think that things will be moving at a faster pace. There will be much more going on behind the scenes that we know nothing about. It will be a technological minefield but they will be working hard.
  11. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    DT100. If you refer to Image1 it seems to show someone else standing with their back to the guy in the main view. I really don't know why this would be but it may be worth following up on in other CCTV. If it was a supermarket que I would expect all the customers to be facing in the same direction.
  12. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    Another idea and JMO. Perhaps Corrie just had enough, decided to move on and is being well looked after by true "friends" who are covering up for him. There are various close knit communities out there and they will all look after each other..... reward or no reward!
  13. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    Way back I seem to remember that during the search, dog/s were used and scent was lost somewhere near Tesco's. This was later discounted and never been mentioned again.
  14. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #15

    Perhaps phone was accidentally thrown in the bin along with the take away wrappers. Last seen on CCTV with hands in pockets,,, hence no take away or wrapping so must have disposed of it in HS before leaving. I hope they searched HS for this while carrying out the forensic search!
  15. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #14

    It all changes by the minute so I would take this like a pinch of salt IMO
  16. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #14

    speed = distance / time If we have the distance and the times how can we have the speed going by mast pings? I.E. if you travelled at 100MPH at stages and made a stop along the route?
  17. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #14

    IMO, I really couldn't give a toss who MIS are registered with and I hope their technologies bring this case forward along with a lot of others for missing persons in the future. There are far too many using modern technology to commit serious crime while GCHQ, NSA and others get hit so hard...
  18. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #13

    If this is the case and only basic information has been divulged, a lot of information released in the public domain may be inaccurate / restricted / misleading.....hence the confusion in many aspects of this case. If MIS have access to all the available technical data this could be what will...
  19. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #13

    Times and pings may never tie up to vehicle movement/s. Last I read was according to pings a vehicle would have travelled at 12MPH. If same vehicle were travelling at 70MPH - 100MPH,, would that not then allow for a stop along the way between pings?
  20. C

    UK UK - Corrie McKeague, 23, Bury St Edmunds, 24 September 2016 #13

    Have you read up on MIS website and the services they provide? I'm sure these are just examples and they no doubt have many more capabilities at their disposal. I expect that TW will have discussed the matter and a plan will have been made for the best way forward. It will be very interesting to...

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
2,365
Total visitors
2,435

Forum statistics

Threads
601,852
Messages
18,130,700
Members
231,162
Latest member
Kaffro
Back
Top