Search results

That incident did not prove any one lied. There is no reason for her to take the witness stand. That was wishful thinking on their part. IMO

I think mrjitty was joking. The DT did say at one time that JG was going to have to be a witness, which didn't really make any sense, but...?

Yes, if it's true, as they imply in their motions, that there is 'no' real evidence against RA, and the bullet has no valid chain of custody, and all the confessions are phoney and meaningless, then why not just go to trial as soon as possible? Why do they try so desperately to dump the judge...

I could be wrong, but it sounds to me like LE knows who she has met upon with and they are trying to catch up to them? It's also a possibility she wanted to go live with Dad or his family instead of Moms? IDK...

I'd think he'd still be carrying it in case he ran into a problem with someone. But the surviving witness didn't see a knife, so who knows?

Ok, if you are about to go break into a house, when exactly do you put your gloves on? I'd think you'd do so right before you went inside. Maybe on the drive over too? When did he touch an object that was full of BK's DNA. It wouldn't have been just a slight touch a long time earlier...

So the guy puts gloves on for this murder and THEN he touches BK and gets BK's skin cells on his glove and then immediately goes and opens the knife sheath, leaving it on the bed? So in this scenario, BK has to be pretty close by?

By car or bike???? :oops:

If the oldest daughter was home, I feel like she'd be worried about the baby sister being out in the car. I hope she wasn't home. :confused: Going by the cameras, Dad never checked on her? :mad: We can't write this off as a horrible accident, where a tired parent drives to work and forgets to...

wow....did she meet someone online? :oops:

It makes me sad to see Loan's father cutting uo his lunch for him... :( He takes his son to ride horses at Grandma's farm and he never sees him again?

Right, partially under the body of a girl who was stabbed to death. What are the odds it was there but with no connection to the killings? Especially when you add to the mix, that the car w/no front plate, seen parking out side at the start of the incident and seen speeding away afterwards...

In my experience, as a resident of LA suburbs, it is really unusual for a 15 yr old not to have a cell or a tablet. Especially if she is going back and forth between 2 parents---she'd really need her own way to contact and be contacted by them,IMO. But as you say, it doesn't seem that it's...

It's really odd if she purposely left it behind because she was probably going to go spend the evening at Auntie's house. She wouldn't be riding bike back to Dad's that same evening. So she was either spending night at Auntie's or Mom was going to pick her up later? Either way, I'd think...

But that sheath was found underneath one of the murdered students. So it was obviously left by the killer. whether the murder weapon was in that sheath, we don't know yet. But it was found underneath a dead body. That is pretty incriminating.

I'm sorry to hear that. I hope it works out well. Must be exhausting for you and your child. Good luck.

I don't usually see those kinds of custody issues with 15 year olds. Teens can reach out to the other parents and can also set up visits, unlike younger kids. I think it's more likely that she may have stopped to see a friend or acquaintance...but I hope not. It's been too long.

Yes, it was the D's fault because they filed the wrong motions. The ones they filed nullified the judge's legal need to respond to the prior motion. It was on the D, not the judge. She followed the law correctly. The deadline was nullified by the repetitive motions filed by the DT. It was a bad...

Basically, it seems they got some bad legal advice from the Due Cause Gang, because all of those repetitive motions they filed were nullifying their prior motions. Instead of just filing a complaint about JG not responding to their Franks motion, they instead just filed another Frank's Motion...

She didn't have to meet those deadlines because the DT kept filing other copy cat motions, which nullified and paused the legal requirement of Judge G needing to reply to the previous motions. They ruled that "the DT waived any right to relief in this manner by filing motions beyond the time...