Search results

totally agree on all points. there should be some kind of basic comprehension exam, at least. its scary if you think about it...a jury of your peers. i would think "im screwed" if some of the idiots i have met in my life were in charge of my fate. its amazing the things people can buck up if...

what you said...you know, what i was referring to..try rereading:seeya:

that isnt exactly true as long as the knowledge of guilt wasnt too specific..he could present some sort of case. he could present the possibility of someone else doing it, which could lead to reasonable doubt.

youre on the right track..but.. the attorney MUST follow his clients wishes. he cannot plead him out if he doesnt want to plead guilty or take a deal. his options would be :present the case to the best of his ability. OR if he is unable, recuse himself from the case.

yeah..lawyers arent allowed to present anything that they have a reason to believe is untrue. if he confessed to the killing,kidnapping (lets say he blurted it all out for instance " i took her, i killed her, ill tell them where her body is if youll just get me a deal!"), that COULD hinder his...

well im actually thinking its *possible* that it MIGHT have something to do with his clients perceived guilt. as i understand it..the public defender cannot present anything he knows to be untrue. so if AGT confessed to him..it could be that he feels unable to defend his client adequetaley...

just wanted to clarify, i didnt see if anyone else had since this is "murder with special circumstance", that means since sierra died during the comission of a crime (specifically a felony,kidnapping) , no matter HOW she died-it is considered murder.

how about this. if you are interested, i will pm you the number of the person i did the interview with, and the person who did my drug screen (owner/operator).id ask you ask them your questions in general terms though as i did pass my drug screen and am not an idiot and would not willingly...

thats what i was saying. its up to the employers. showing your recommendation does not turn a positive into a negative. thanks for clearing that up!

i am aware of the difference between arraignment and trial. i just believe the assumption of murder (with the facts we have been presented with) are circumstantial and not enough to convict as it stands. and while im sure there are some facts they are holding back, i dont believe they have...

i dont know what state you live in..but in hawaii and california i know this to be true. i too, would like a link to back up your statements.i have had, and have had friends that have run into troubles in many avenunes (jobs, housing) despite our having a MM card. i just recently had an...

you are correct. also in with the qotations. its actually just a recommendation, not a prescription. i agree with the death penalty thing. without a body, that would be a hard case.

now THIS is untrue. the laws havent exactly caught up with the fact that you can smoke weed legally. even if you have a valid prescription for weed, such as i do, it is the employers discrestion whether or not they will accept it. i have not found ONE employer outside of marijuana related...

id like to see those videos...where were they recorded from? traffic cams or private security cameras?

its not the fact they had a medicinal marijuana card. its the fact they were taking marijuana. im assuming they wouldve also had to blood test? this may be a little off topic, but PLEASE , if you are going to smoke marijuana and your state allows it GET A CARD. it IS safer. a lot of dumb...

ive never heard this. its medical information so it is kept CONFIDENTIAL and theres no way for your employer to know you have one unless you disclose it. anyway, back to the case at hand. im a newbie and this is my first post btw several things; i wonder if AGT was a drug dealer, or...