Search results

This part of the letter drives me the most crazy. It says "you must follow our instructions to the letter" and then the instructions are kind of nonchalant. Call between 8 and 10? Wouldn't a kidnapper want to have a tighter, specific schedule? There's the "tomorrow" issue and also "I advise you...

I think the note has a feminine or motherly tone. Quoting from movies may be juvenile, but I think a lot of those are coincidences.

I can only assume they thought Burke would come across as harmless / a sweet "kid", a stark contrast to the picture they paint of the cunning, evil, sadistic intruder.

The park she is talking about and the area of the preserve it leads into (I'm there at least once a week) is usually busy enough in the daytime that I can't see anyone thinking they can get away with anything there. He may have been looking to mess with someone, freak her out or whatever.

Brady Park is too small to hide anything (I'm from the area) but it leads directly into the Massapequa preserve, which is another story.

Seeking attention for medical issues but also posting vacation photos on social media ziplining and riding camels. Wanted to have it both ways and was so smug about it at trial.

Breaking political news regarding an indictment will drown Terry out and into instant obscurity.

It's shocking, why not just say he's lying at this point? I really hope this jury does the right thing.

Terry's lawyers are telling the jury "Terry is still on the mountain" and that he needs GPS to go to the store, after they saw photos of the endless vacations he's been taking around the globe after the accident. I have to wonder if they're angry or laughing.

I thought maybe when they collided, and she yelled at him and walked off, he took that as a slight thinking she should have done a song and dance in his honor instead.

I think her lawyer should have let him continue with his anti-celebrity conspiracy theory message board ramblings as it establishes a clear "she's a celebrity and deserves to be taken down" frame of mind.

This case and its evidence is an Agatha Christie style Too Many Cooks scenario where nothing is solvable because who can say who did what.

When this case first happened and I wasn't paying much attention, I thought the general public were just being quick to lump the R''s in with the likes of Susan Smith, and that the R's were being judged for the pageant photos. Funny enough, it was watching Lou Smit explain how an intruder did it...

6. The Ramseys eventually admitted Burke was awake for the 911 call in an interview with The Enquirer. It matters because they said he was in bed/ asleep, why lie about anything? (personally, I think this ties into their narrative of "move along nothing to see here" where JonBenet is asleep...

a) it's a flippant remark, a way of saying find out who the DNA belongs to, even if it could have an innocent explanation with a friend of Burke's as an example. b) he slipped and revealed new information. or c) he suspects the DNA could be a friend of Burke's and is trying to get ahead of...

At Crime-Con, while discussing the foreign male DNA, John made this strange statement “It would be in their best interest to test it, find out it belonged to one of Burke’s little friends that happened to be there.” at 51.12 CrimeCon 2022 recordings | Mysite (ramseycasedocumentproject.com)

Replying to an old post, but this theory really clicked with me. I'm thinking she may have put the sock on and picked up the knife to get the sock fibers on the handle, and the few droplets of blood just happened to come from the handle. She wasn't even thinking about blood transfer, otherwise...

Then any underwear would do. What are the chances the intruder finds the closest thing to a match? Just thinking out loud... The specific day of the week is possibly an attempt by J or B to fool Patsy, the person who would know what underwear JB had on? Or, Patsy and/or John wants her in a...

I can understand an intruder trying to get rid of evidence but I see no reason for them to be invested in trying to "fix" the appearance of her underwear or replacing them at all. There is something child-like in thinking similar underwear will somehow fix things or fool someone so you can say...

Patsy's whole life was her image, that's enough motive for a cover up right there without even getting into who may have killed her daughter.