Boytwnmom
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2008
- Messages
- 1,652
- Reaction score
- 297
trying to detain Trayvon, you know, so he wouldn't "get away" like all the other a$%holes did. Instead of ever identifying himself he stalks the kid and suddenly appears and grabs him to keep him there until police arrive. I have no doubt at that point Trayvon freaks and does whatever he can to get away as he still has no clue who this unidentified stalker is. Trayvon isn't looking for a fight either obviously, he's trying to escape this creep. Then GZ shows his gun in some way, maybe because he was such a chicken that as soon as anyone touched him back he resorted to deadly force. Once the gun was out, Trayvon really freaks, hence the wrenching screams and then GZ shoots.
I have no idea why people find this difficult to understand. It's clear as day to me. He wanted to make sure Trayvon didn't get away. Why else would he follow him after being told not to? What was he going to do? If he wanted to "talk" to him he had every chance in the world while Trayvon was walking by him. He could stare at the kid and describe everything he was wearing down to the button on his hoodie but he couldn't open his mouth to ask a question that would have prevented all that ensued. This is, always and forever, GZ's fault, in every moral and legal sense. His stalking and detaining Trayvon rightfully put him in fear for his life and GZ never had the right to shoot him for the confrontation that was 100% his doing.
Trayvon has no history of aggressive behavior but GZ clearly does and has repeatedly resorted to violence to solve problems. GZ took a gun to stalk a kid and detain him. His behavior was therefore not lawful at any point after he disregarded the instructions of the 911 operator and went after Trayvon with his gun.
I have no idea why people find this difficult to understand. It's clear as day to me. He wanted to make sure Trayvon didn't get away. Why else would he follow him after being told not to? What was he going to do? If he wanted to "talk" to him he had every chance in the world while Trayvon was walking by him. He could stare at the kid and describe everything he was wearing down to the button on his hoodie but he couldn't open his mouth to ask a question that would have prevented all that ensued. This is, always and forever, GZ's fault, in every moral and legal sense. His stalking and detaining Trayvon rightfully put him in fear for his life and GZ never had the right to shoot him for the confrontation that was 100% his doing.
Trayvon has no history of aggressive behavior but GZ clearly does and has repeatedly resorted to violence to solve problems. GZ took a gun to stalk a kid and detain him. His behavior was therefore not lawful at any point after he disregarded the instructions of the 911 operator and went after Trayvon with his gun.
It would be really hard for me to wrap my head around Zimmerman
carrying a gun and starting a fight. It just does not add up in my head.