redkatrampant
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2008
- Messages
- 1,964
- Reaction score
- 5
Wow, just wow, I'm sorry but you're going to need to point out where anyone even remotely suggested that the defendant should be silenced because what they say might be upsetting. Or that the justice sysetm should work any other way.
Please don't misconstrue what I posted as I never even remotely implied any of that.
I said that to say that the family could have just left if they didn't want to hear it is absurd, there was no time for them to leave as they didn't know what he was going to say. And to say that if a victim's family doesn't want to be upset they could just stay away is absurd as well, that's saying that the victim's family never has a right to be upset over things said in the courtroom.
We can all probably link to thousands of posts right here where posters have been upset by what suspects say at trial, seems the rules apparently are different for this suspect, we should all just ignore whatever he says, and just cheer for his right to say it.
Moving on now.
JMHO
One of US s going through this right now,Although IIRC, most of the family has been sequestered because they are witnesses.However, If I may, I am pretty sure she has been upset by things said,etc.She knew this going in,we can say that the Martin family did not, BUT,I am of the opinion that they had been counseled as to some extent of being upset by testimony.