I didn't hear about this. Can you please explain? TIA
Older, well known wealthy businessman, speculated on here that he might be the father of Caylee. Will hunt through threads when I get time to send you in the right direction to read about him!
I didn't hear about this. Can you please explain? TIA
LOL - That is the only chance she has. The evidence is too overwhelming and the only one which she can turn that evidence on is George. Think about it.
Some think she will turn on Lee, but I don't see that happening because there is no evidence to support that Lee was around Caylee. Cindy was gone to work. George was not working then.
I really do believe before it is over that will be what they concoct.
on hln tonight one of the talking heads said its because the state waited over 45 days to put the death p back on....it has to do with the amount of time they waited.......is what i think
When trying to sow seeds of doubt to a jury, a whole new story doesn't have to work. But just poke holes in the one being told.
Which means that JB wouldn't have to explain those things you mentioned. He would just have to go after the crediblity of the witnesses . With Cindy, he can point to her lying again and again. All trying to help KC. But still, it points her out to being an untrustworthy witness that a jury shouldn't believe.
Those folks have went on record saying they call this person or that person at this time or that time. If the phone records don't back it up.... It might be used to show that the person sould be considered a lier.
Have Cindy, George and Lee's cell phone records been released ? I think I would have heard about it, if they were, but I could have forgotten...my brain is about to explode from all the information ! I imagine LE did seek these phone records...I remember when Cindy turned her cell phone over to LE, but, IIRC, there was only like two days worth of calls on there. Obviously she ad erased some things.
If the defense were to use this lame excuse, how would they explain why she diden't at lease warn her parent's that their lives might be in danger? Isn't that what a loving and concernd daughter would do.i voted they are going to say someone else...not the family or the friends that we know of now....
i think it will be someone that wanted to "teach her a lesson" that said if she did (?) then they would give caylee back and kc had until her 3rd birthday to do (?) they gave her a "script" to follow-stuff-caylee is with the nanny.... to tell her family when they asked to talk to caylee or to see caylee. defense will say that kc was told to go and act normal with her boy friend and friends so that no one would think there was anything wrong. defense will say that kc failed to do (?) so the kidnapers killed caylee....and framed kc for the murder.....all the defense needs is someone elses dna or and finger prints with in the bag with the childs body....and any dna and or prints in the car that matched.....i think the defense will say that the person who took caylee is someone she didnt know but was working for someone she had contact with before....that is why she used the nanny story....defense will say after she left her car....she was then affraid these people would come after her parents and brother if she told anything else.....defense will say ...kc new they killed caylee and new they would kill her parents as well.....
very long stretch....but just an idea of what the only way i could think of how the defense was going to go ........
I would like to know what other defense attorney's think of this "throwing an innocent person under the bus" to raise reasonable doubt for a client. I am not a legal expert, but I would think that there are some ethical lawyers that would refuse to hurt others in the process of defending a client.I think the proper answer to this poll should be "Baez will implicate anyone possible". He'd rather see any other person found guilty instead of his precious Casey.
He may try to avoid implicating her family members, but if push comes to shove, he'll be shoving those As into the cell as quickly as he can, if possible.
For JB, it's anyone but KC.
I would like to know what other defense attorney's think of this "throwing an innocent person under the bus" to raise reasonable doubt for a client. I am not a legal expert, but I would think that there are some ethical lawyers that would refuse to hurt others in the process of defending a client.
I can see JB wanting the phone records of everyone on the list except Keith W.
WTH?
I must have missed something somewhere. When did he and KC have a chat? lol
You need one more choice in the poll, "All of the above." I believe they could go with the SOD defense, somone to be named at a later date did it. Better know as the Some Other Dude defense.
I think the proper answer to this poll should be "Baez will implicate anyone possible". He'd rather see any other person found guilty instead of his precious Casey.
He may try to avoid implicating her family members, but if push comes to shove, he'll be shoving those As into the cell as quickly as he can, if possible.
For JB, it's anyone but KC.
Means, Motive, Opportunity:
Besides Casey, who else had the MMO to murder Caylee sometime between the time she returned to the Anthony home from visiting her maternal great grandfather on June 15, 2008 (Father's Day) and the time Casey is seen at Blockbuster Video with TL the next night June 16, 2008 ... no Caylee in sight ....
That's the window of opportunity, IMO.
DT
I have always said they will go after George. He admitted to seeing her last (which I never believed) KC will say she left after the fight and left Caylee there. She will say George has always had a violent temper (which he has exhibited many times on TV) and that she was terrified of him. She will claim he put the body in her car (he had a key) and when she found it she freaked out so bad she had a psychotic break (flat emotions, etc.) She will say he threatened to kill Cindy, Lee and her if she told (he bought a gun and hid it) and he planned on killing them all if she talked. She will say she was protecting her mother and brother. She will say he gave her the "script" and made sure she did not vary from it and told her he would get her out of it if she would keep her mouth shut.
She will say the gas can incident was when she first saw the body and she didn't know what to do so she ran. Remember she said "he" ran over the squirrels which made the car smell. That is why he "chased" her as he told. She has been afraid to speak because she knew he would kill the others, so she waited until trial to tell the story.