CarolinaMoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 5,173
- Reaction score
- 126
The only things that I can think of would be
a) They claim that she had permission from AH to use the checks or because she had permission to use AH's car and the checkbook was in there that gives her permission by omission (kinda sorta)
b) they claim that she did use the checkbook but she had no money and was in panic mode looking for Caylee and needed the money and that she had every intention of paying it back but got caught before she could
I don't think either of these would work so I hope that they have come up with something more inventive. This case is truly cut and dried and is going to be a no brainer for the jury. Better to plead No Contest and take whatever punishment is appropriate or beg the proscecution for a plea deal with time served or a small amount of time left after time served.
Pretty lame at best, just as you say. B won't work at all because any mention of Caylee would bring in the murder trial!
This case is a quick no-brainer and Baez & Lyon are turning it into a lot more than it is.