2010.01.15 Letter to Judge Strickland WFTV

[LambChop]

You're right. General rule of thumb is for every 10°C increase in temperature the rate of a chemical reaction approximately doubles. This is true for most chemical reactions, but it's only a "rule of thumb" and can't be applied to ALL chemical reactions. It's based on the Arrhenius equation (we called it the erronius equation in my Pchem class, cause it's a BEAST to derive and we made lots of errors in attempting it, lol). It's an assumption that's pretty useful in general chemistry, but it doesn't account for the complex nature of biochemical reactions.
Biological systems function optimally over a range of temperatures.... but there is a point at which changes in temperature will no longer increase the reaction rate. Temperatures that are too high (or too low) will ultimately denature enzymes and/or damage the critter's ability to function. That's why differen't organisms (aka critters) exist in certain environments and thrive under certain conditions. Think of a bell-shaped curve when you're looking at the effects of temp on living systems.
For example, you can study the way temperature effects the metabolism of yeast by measuring the amount of carbon dioxide they produce (their waste product) over a range of temperatures. You'll find that the amount of carbon dioxide they produce will increase as temperature increases to a point. Beyond that point, continuing to increase the temperature will not result in any further increase in metabolic activity. Even further increases in temperature will decrease the metabolic activity. Very high temperatures will put a stop to metabolism (it kills/cooks the yeast).
This is probably WAY more explanation that anyone cared to have... but hope it's helpful anyway! :blowkiss:

Now here is a PERFECT example of how a "Biologist should write! JMO

 

[seeing_eye]

Hmm...well the trial's are about to begin and the damage control is in full force I see. All the letter's, George even read his live, the interview with Lyons...we have much more to see coming from this circus.

"IMO" This letter was written by Cindy or she had someone write it for her.
If you read carefully does this not sound like the grammar that Cindy would use? The words, "Misconstrued" and others.
The fact that the person who wrote the letter claims they know "Cindy Cleaned Out the Car".
All the information about the "Grunds" and Casey's ex.
The name given as Caylee's father. I will believe that one thought. I sure hope LE will get his DNA ASAP. Was this a slip from whom ever wrote this letter?
This person is doing a lot of finger pointing and I hope LE finds out who he/she are so they can face some charges....enough with the BS I say and let's get the trials rolling and Justice for Caylee!!!!

I really feel this was something that Cindy A. wrote. Who else would have access to this information if LE didn't look into it as they say? Maybe LE never got any of this info or they did and these people don't know anything about what happen to Caylee.
Again, to me Cindy passed along this letter to someone, or she wrote it herself. JMO.

IMO, Cindy passed along the information in this letter to a friend or relative who lives in Cleveland, Ohio and is a "scientist/researcher."

 

[RR0004]

The expert's conclusion supports the State's evidence against KC, and goes against allegations made by the author of the letter.

I understand the man in this case was exonerated. In part, because the victim was only alleged to have been in the van for a few minutes after death. In this case the body was not in the van the required amount of time to produce post mortem death banding.

The evidence against KC is much stronger because of the obvious smell of decomposition, as confirmed by many witnesses. Not to mention, the cadaver dog hit on the truck of the car. The evidence against KC supports the body being in the trunk for the period of time required to produce post mortem death banding.
IMO~

Thank you for mentioning the cadaver dogs. The fact that they alerted to the trunk is often overlooked. I don't remember the writer stating anything about this. Wonder if they're in on the "cover up"?

 

[RR0004]

Hmm...well the trial's are about to begin and the damage control is in full force I see. All the letter's, George even read his live, the interview with Lyons...we have much more to see coming from this circus.

"IMO" This letter was written by Cindy or she had someone write it for her.
If you read carefully does this not sound like the grammar that Cindy would use? The words, "Misconstrued" and others.
The fact that the person who wrote the letter claims they know "Cindy Cleaned Out the Car".
All the information about the "Grunds" and Casey's ex.
The name given as Caylee's father. I will believe that one thought. I sure hope LE will get his DNA ASAP. Was this a slip from whom ever wrote this letter?
This person is doing a lot of finger pointing and I hope LE finds out who he/she are so they can face some charges....enough with the BS I say and let's get the trials rolling and Justice for Caylee!!!!

I really feel this was something that Cindy A. wrote. Who else would have access to this information if LE didn't look into it as they say? Maybe LE never got any of this info or they did and these people don't know anything about what happen to Caylee.
Again, to me Cindy passed along this letter to someone, or she wrote it herself. JMO.

Well, I'm not sure about that...but IMO these people have been in contact with her and her "people" so it wouldn't surprise me that they offered their input.

 

[LambChop]

CA and GA are witnesses for the State. This would be a big mistake, HUGE. JMO

 

[autumnlover]

Do we know for a fact the writer is from Ohio? If so, interesting coincidence considering that's where the A's are from.

 

[Horace Finklestein]

Hmm...well the trial's are about to begin and the damage control is in full force I see. All the letter's, George even read his live, the interview with Lyons...we have much more to see coming from this circus.

"IMO" This letter was written by Cindy or she had someone write it for her.
If you read carefully does this not sound like the grammar that Cindy would use? The words, "Misconstrued" and others.
The fact that the person who wrote the letter claims they know "Cindy Cleaned Out the Car".
All the information about the "Grunds" and Casey's ex.
The name given as Caylee's father. I will believe that one thought. I sure hope LE will get his DNA ASAP. Was this a slip from whom ever wrote this letter?
This person is doing a lot of finger pointing and I hope LE finds out who he/she are so they can face some charges....enough with the BS I say and let's get the trials rolling and Justice for Caylee!!!!

I really feel this was something that Cindy A. wrote. Who else would have access to this information if LE didn't look into it as they say? Maybe LE never got any of this info or they did and these people don't know anything about what happen to Caylee.
Again, to me Cindy passed along this letter to someone, or she wrote it herself. JMO.

The dishonest liar who wrote that rambling screed did seem fixated on moving attention to other (innocent) people. Not sure if it's one of the Anthonys but it seems like their handiwork in some capacity.

I'm so sick of this nonsense 'reasoning' that if someone says they heard a person's name then that person must exist (I've heard of Santa Clause for 30 years), or that if Casey said hello to a person 6 months ago then that person should be a suspect...it's so played out. I can't wait for this to be over with. I can deal with the crazies once she's convicted but it wears me out right now.

 

[InspectorGadget]

I think most of us are aware how quickly decomposition progresses in a temperature environment of well over 90 degrees. This was not a case of decomposition in a mild or cold climate environment. It makes sense to me, the post mortem death band is dependent on a certain stage of decomp. Because of the extreme heat, and fast rate of decomposition, the body had reached the stage required for a death band to appear. I'm certainly no expert. This is just what makes the most sense to me.

Hi Magnolia

I don't think there is any doubt that bodies decompose more rapidly in high temperatures.

I have yet to see a photo of the disputed Q12 hair or any mention of a death band in the documents.

Are we likely to see it in court I wonder?

 

[Mominva]

When i click the link to read the letter nothing comes up. Has this letter been posted anywhere on here .TIA

 

[sleutherontheside]

When i click the link to read the letter nothing comes up. Has this letter been posted anywhere on here .TIA

It is there...it may take a moment to load depending on your net speed. Just checked ....it works.

 

[Pondering Mind]

CA and GA are witnesses for the State. This would be a big mistake, HUGE. JMO

uh huh.. ...but it sure wouldn't be their first mistake, imo of course... :snooty:


interesting....and verryy familiar, hmmm..:yes:..


You are absolutely right though LambChop..a HUGE mistake..prolly why they used someone else though, ya know..gotta circumvent the system in true Anthony style! <<MOO..








inocchio:inocchio:inocchio:inocchio: ..

 

[magnolia]

Hi Magnolia

I don't think there is any doubt that bodies decompose more rapidly in high temperatures.

I have yet to see a photo of the disputed Q12 hair or any mention of a death band in the documents.

Are we likely to see it in court I wonder?

But, you "did" see and read the report referencing the Q12 hair sample having characteristics of "apparent decomposition" at the proximal root end.

The Q12 hair sample was preserved on a slide. Yes, I think it's very likely the hair will be seen in court.

IMO~

 

[Reagan]

Thank you for mentioning the cadaver dogs. The fact that they alerted to the trunk is often overlooked. I don't remember the writer stating anything about this. Wonder if they're in on the "cover up"?

Hola friend!
Fortunately the cadaver dogs were one of the most alarming things presented to Judge S during KC's initial bond hearing. I'm sure he hasn't forgotten, and I just hope it will be admitted into trial for a jury to hear.

 

[Reagan]

By the way, I think I found the site that was referenced in the letter. Trying to read it now.

http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01242005-145140/

 

[Gnatcatcher]

Oh for God's sake. Deathbands, smelly cars, pizza, cell phones, Wally World and nannies aside... "The truth is the truth, everything else is a lie. There is nothing in between." - Margaret O'Brien, "Tenth Street Angel".

Casey killed Caylee.

And everyone knows it.

 

[AZlawyer]

Isn't anyone going to sleuth this stuff lol?

I'll get us started:

Letter writer's info: Juliet L (actually, is it OK to use ful names if they are fake people?) owned a condo at Westgate Lakes,

Actual info: Juliet L doesn't appear in Orange County property records at all (neither does Juliette L), there is no parcel with that number, although Westgate Lakes is indeed a condo property on Turkey Lake Rd (different parcel numbers). Looks like timeshares, though--they are all owned by Westgate Lakes LLC except one that is owned by another corporate entity. No sales there for the last 3 years (probably because they're timeshares).

 

[OneLostGrl]

Hello WS

I just wrote a post this week called "desperately seeking Juliette" because after all this time, I wonder where she is? Where is Zanny's mother? Where are the sisters, the roommates...etc.

Well, it looks like the author of this letter has found them! Great! Now, all that needs be done is for them to come forward. Or, I guess because they took Caylee they will not come forward so Cindy and George will be right up and following these leads and bringing these people to justice! I am sure Cindy and George and Casey's attys will be getting a hold of this author and getting those addresses so that Casey can get out of jail.

This is all true? I have no problem with that...now we should see things start to happen! These people all exist and if this author found out this information then Cindy and her private detective should have no problem.

I have been wondering this whole time whether or not Casey had appropriate behavior while Caylee was missing but now I see that she never did anything wrong before this...so that must mean she did not hurt Caylee.

Will Casey get to see this? I hope so, now she can come forward knowing that someone else has been able to follow all those leads she gave to LE and to Lee that they just could not or would not follow up on. Are they all in on it? Zanny, Samantha, Victor, Gloria...they must all be? I wonder what JH will have to say about all of this? I see by this letter JH has a wife, I wonder when he got married? Must have been after he broke up with Zanny and had her babysit Caylee and Zach that he met her and married her.

Okay Anthonys. Okay Casey. Okay JB. Here you go, all the information you wanted sleuthed by LE: handed to you on a plate. I am sure we will be hearing soon that George and Cindy are all over this, I know if my daughter were innocent and LE was trying to frame her by not following up on leads on the people who really hurt my granddaughter and I got word of leads: I would be right on that!

Great. Good. Grand. We don't need a trial for Casey. Let's go get these people! They exist and are just out there living, knowing that an innocent Casey is in jail. I wonder why they did take Caylee and hurt her? Now, we will find out the truth.

Obviously this is all sarcastic, but I do want to say: I don't WANT Casey to be guilty. I don't WANT it to be true that any adult ever hurts any child. I want to know why, what reason-other than pure evil-would LE and the FBI be wanting to frame an innocent mother? And, why couldn't Lee find these people? Why hasn't Cindy or George gone non stop to find these leads to help save their daughter? Why do strangers care more(the author of this letter)to investigate what Casey says is true than her own family. Shouldn't we have been getting this information from her family that knows she is innocent?

"but in reading her transcripts doesn't actually lie most of the time but is misquoted..." how is she misquoted? If all you have are the transcripts to go by how do you know she was "misquoted?" Hello, author? Please explain because there are a lot of people who want to know the truth of what happened to Caylee and you seem to have it all figured out.

"The story that keeps on changing is the prosecution's-when one scenario does not fit they move to another." I would like an example for this one, I have only known the prosecution to have one story: Casey did it. While the defense has had story after story...

"I have been able to confirm almost everything she said although the police have apparently not." Okay. One more time...well, then everything should be getting cleared up now-right? Way to go citizen. Way to go...

...jmo...

 

[gamom]

If someone already posted, sorry. Just wanted to say that even though this letter appears outrageous, I still took the time to look up the info given in it. The "Jeff Hopkins" she listed at the address in orlando does not exist. Surprise? Not really. But the address she lists in the letter belongs to a person with another last name and they have own the house since 2002. :waitasec:

 

[autumnlover]

If someone already posted, sorry. Just wanted to say that even though this letter appears outrageous, I still took the time to look up the info given in it. The "Jeff Hopkins" she listed at the address in orlando does not exist. Surprise? Not really. But the address she lists in the letter belongs to a person with another last name and they have own the house since 2002. :waitasec:

This revealing information, along with what AZLawyer posted above is the kind of stuff that makes me think the A's are behind this. The letter writer makes claims as if they're facts, VERY much like the A's have done from the beginning. A "mistruth" here...another one there...and before you know it they wind up on the talk show circuit tainting the jury pool with their easily disproven lies. The song remains the same.

 

[AZlawyer]

If someone already posted, sorry. Just wanted to say that even though this letter appears outrageous, I still took the time to look up the info given in it. The "Jeff Hopkins" she listed at the address in orlando does not exist. Surprise? Not really. But the address she lists in the letter belongs to a person with another last name and they have own the house since 2002. :waitasec:

A Jefferson M. H****** did report that as his address in connection with setting up the corp. the letter writer mentioned in 1992. The corporation, for which the letter writer implies Casey was working, was dissolved in 1995, when Casey was 9 years old.

Jefferson H. bought the house in question in 1992 and sold it in 2000, when Casey was 14 years old. By the time he sold the house, JMH was already living in Virginia. I guess the letter writer is saying he moved back to Orlando later?