I was thinking along the same lines sort of....
The media has to request the tapes right?
So if the log is sealed then the media will not know when someone besides her attorneys visit and therefore will not know to request the tape.
Could it have anything to do with this article:
http://www..com/2010/04/casey-anthonys-jail-visits/
It shows that the motion to recuse Judge Strickland was filed with the court at 4:48 PM on Apr. 16th signed by Casey and notarized by Mason. Yet, the jail visitor log shows Mason left the visit with Casey on that day at 4:52 PM.
I am NOT an attorney........and I am going from memory......but I think the difference is this......
Previously, the defense asked that jail videos of visits to KC be destroyed after review. Judge Strickland stated that it was not his jurisdiction to order destruction of records. (IMO......that would be illegal)
The jail has a protocol to follow in order to ensure the safety of inmates, employees, and visitors. Judge Strickland I think went as far as to hint to them to request that they be sealed and that if media wanted them, they could be viewed in camera and reported on, but not necessarily released.
I hate to comment and not link so again I say that I am going from memory and will link up later.
Now......given that the jail logs would be considered public records discovery, if the defense has a good enough reason.....he is within his rights to order them sealed if the reason is in fact valid....but that is far different than destroying them.
Ohhhhhhhhhhh......I just thought of another one.....and then I revert back to logical and neutral SOTS.....
So that the spouse of a "jailhouse visitor" doesn't find out that the emergency midnight meeting was really an excuse to deliver contraband foodstuffs to a client.
Thank you ladies and gentlemen.....we'll be here all week. Be sure to tip your servers and mods before you leave.
Sometimes humor is required to get you through the rough times.
After reading the logs and find she was visited by her parents, etc.. then we would know to request a copy of the visit.
Also, JB could visit any time, stay as long as he wants, and his wife would never find out... Just saying...
Imagine the attention these jail logs will get now after filing this motion.
Exactly! Then they can whine about how Casey is not getting a fair trial due to all the media attention. I just hope that SA has that Gag motion that was denied in the beginning when this comes to trial and the defense tries to blame the media for Casey not getting a fair trial.
The only part that worries me is that if they do end up saying she didn't get a fair trial because of all the media exposure/attention, it will fall back on her defense team. I wonder if then she can claim she had ineffective counsel? Grr....I pray it does not come to that. It seems that is her only way out of this case.
I didn't realize it had been talked about before, sorry, but glad to link it for you again.
Do you think Mason could have faxed the motion from a laptop during the jail visit? Is that possible? Hmmmm, inquiring minds want to know.
I am a paralegal and it is possible he could have faxed or emailed it BUT you are supposed to submit the original to the court which tells me something is fishy here if it was filed before he left the jail. I believe everyone is correct that this could be the reason they want these records sealed because we at WS are too smart for them and always catch ther booboos.
And a little bit of Dancing :bananapowerslide:
Would the HIPPA law that protects us all have anything to do with sealing the logs, albeit too late? The Health Privacy Act says it's nobody's business what the state of our personal health is or who the health professionals we see are. Or even IF we see a health professional