marspiter
Blah Blah Blah
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2009
- Messages
- 1,219
- Reaction score
- 1
I wish the prosecution would just hand over all dicoverables for crying out loud. Spare us all the tedium. It's a shame the defense are supposed to have to figure out what the state has and ask for it specifically in order to receive discovery. Isn't there a legal presumption that the state will provide all discovery and that all the experts, labs, etc will provide all discovery without a motion being made for every tiny piece by tiny piece? I guess not.
It should also be noted that discovery is reciprocal. The defense is required to disclose it's findings and evidence as well..... to date the defense has submitted.... a witness list.... that matches that of the prosecutions. The defenses secrecy of its evidence is actually hurting them at these hearings imho.
For example the pictures couldn't exactly be ruled on in this hearing because JP can't rule in a vacuum. Meaning that the defense hasn't released its evidence yet which will help determine which photos are relevant and which are not.
Also as many have stated before my post here, JB needs to be specific in what he is asking for because he is essentially asking for items that are not discoverable or are held by entities that are not in this courts jurisdiction and JB needs to file the proper paper work in the relevant jurisdiction. I seem to remember this topic being covered many times before this hearing though.