He doesn't impress me either ZsaZsa. He impresses me more than AL or LBK or JB do, but still.He does not impress me at all. When is he planning on getting up to speed on this case? Because something happened prior to his coming on the case does not give him the excuse to say at this late stage that he doesn't know anything about it ( Kronk allegations).
He must not have read the prior LE interviews with CA's co workers, he insists that what they said then was not said.
What made CA excited was overhearing the conversation between KC and LA where she admitted Caylee had been kidnapped. Then she went to the phone and called 911- the terrible smell of death finally penetrated her brain and she realized what had really happened.
I have listened three times to what Cheney Mason said after court today, and I still don't know what he said about TES and the searches on Suburban.
What does this mean?
Cheney Mason:
"The public has been made to believe that these people searched the exact area where the body was, or tried to and couldn't, the fact is they didn't try to and they didn't-they weren't there and it was impassable at the time. So there's a lot of people mistakin' things of what happened back in the summer of 2008 and what happened in the winter of 2008.
If we were able to establish a reasonable doubt as to when the body got put there, and it comes at a time when KC couldn't have done it then we know conclusively that somebody else had to do it. If we know that somebody else put the body there, it's a question of who, and how and when. So thats all we're pursuing. We don't know-I wasn't there-you weren't there, all I know is that the people who have searched the area, many of them have given different stories aabout the condition of the place. Some say its under water as an excuse of why they couldn't find the body. We have witness say it wasn't under water so that means it wasn't there............................."
Cheney was BS'ing but to me he was saying that they are still investigating the disposal of Caylee's remains since there are so many conflicting stories.
He was also asserting that there is uncertainty as to when Caylee went missing, with a strategy to shift the timeline.
These together can create reasonable doubt that SODDI if they can shift things to where KC was not able to dump the remains, etc.
The only option is to remove KC from the scene, like the smell in the car and dispute the timeline, etc.
HE COULD NOT LOOK KATHI B IN THE EYE ! he told her why don't you just go to law school-lol. he seemed very anxiety laden-lol.
What is the delay in releasing the Defense Motion which was filed on Friday, to the public???
Mason said he took depositions on Thursday, June 17th which prompted him to file the Defense Motion (re: the 911 calls) on Friday, June 18th. WHERE IS that Motion? I want to read it!!!!!!!!!!
BTW...LDB made a comment about how employees statements made during depos had not changed? But later said something about them not understanding the questions as they were intended or something?
Awaiting the hearing on video for replay
But didn't she also make reference to the fact that the information provided by the employees at Thursdays depos had not changed from their previous statements?
I thought I heard her state that and was thinking of NTS statement in another thread wondering if the two had "changed their stories"....
She did say that. I am assuming she has a transcript. She definetly knows what was said though, from the proffer made in court today.
*snipped*
I thought about this last night...
Considering the timing - depos on June 17th and motion filed June 18th - I am thinking the way LDB knew the particulars of the depo is that Mason probably attached an exhibit of the pertinent portions of the depo supporting his argument to his motion, and the SA was copied on it. That is why LDB was able to make her proffer to the court. All I know for sure, is she KNOWS the pertinent portions of the depo that CM was referring to in his motion.
I still find it curious why we haven't SEEN the actual motion. You'd think the media would have a copy by now....:waitasec:
I have listened three times to what Cheney Mason said after court today, and I still don't know what he said about TES and the searches on Suburban.
What does this mean?
Cheney Mason:
"The public has been made to believe that these people searched the exact area where the body was, or tried to and couldn't, the fact is they didn't try to and they didn't-they weren't there and it was impassable at the time. So there's a lot of people mistakin' things of what happened back in the summer of 2008 and what happened in the winter of 2008.
If we were able to establish a reasonable doubt as to when the body got put there, and it comes at a time when KC couldn't have done it then we know conclusively that somebody else had to do it. If we know that somebody else put the body there, it's a question of who, and how and when. So thats all we're pursuing. We don't know-I wasn't there-you weren't there, all I know is that the people who have searched the area, many of them have given different stories aabout the condition of the place. Some say its under water as an excuse of why they couldn't find the body. We have witness say it wasn't under water so that means it wasn't there............................."
Me too!!! WHY hasn't the media published that Motion yet?????
I PMed MM this morning and asked him if he could possibly get a copy of it......
I want to see exactly WHO did a deposition on Thursday .....
Her answer should have been...No thank you. I'm all about exposing, not suppressing the truth. I'll leave that to you.
WE HAVE IT!!! Go check out TWA's thumbnails in the 911 page! :woohoo:
WE HAVE IT!!! Go check out TWA's thumbnails in the 911 page! :woohoo:
Am I missing a link here. The motion I saw on RHs site is only a copy, not the one filed with the court. it has no time stamp on it. I remember JB doing this another time and the actual motion filed was different than the "leaked" one he gave the media.
*snipped*
I thought about this last night...
Considering the timing - depos on June 17th and motion filed June 18th - I am thinking the way LDB knew the particulars of the depo is that Mason probably attached an exhibit of the pertinent portions of the depo supporting his argument to his motion, and the SA was copied on it. That is why LDB was able to make her proffer to the court. All I know for sure, is she KNOWS the pertinent portions of the depo that CM was referring to in his motion.
I still find it curious why we haven't SEEN the actual motion. You'd think the media would have a copy by now....:waitasec:
Am I missing a link here. The motion I saw on RHs site is only a copy, not the one filed with the court. it has no time stamp on it. I remember JB doing this another time and the actual motion filed was different than the "leaked" one he gave the media.
Don't both sides have the opportunity to be present for depositions? Is it possible that a rep of the prosecutors office was present during these depositions, or am I confusing this with something else?
Thought this issue was brought up (on forum) during the talk of impending Dominic Casey deposition...that Baez had every right to be there unless the SA issued an investigative subpoena, which is what they did....so no go Baezo....?
Don't both sides have the opportunity to be present for depositions? Is it possible that a rep of the prosecutors office was present during these depositions, or am I confusing this with something else?
Thought this issue was brought up (on forum) during the talk of impending Dominic Casey deposition...that Baez had every right to be there unless the SA issued an investigative subpoena, which is what they did....so no go Baezo....?