How DARE she ask for this?!? Let's see, murder for hire, adultery, suspected in the disappearance of her stepson. What makes her think SHE is in the wrong here? What a narcissist.
Adultery? First, I've heard of that. Where can I find more info?
How DARE she ask for this?!? Let's see, murder for hire, adultery, suspected in the disappearance of her stepson. What makes her think SHE is in the wrong here? What a narcissist.
bbm: none of these tmh "allegations" are in the divorce petition:
http://media.wweek.com/attach/2010/06/29/Divorce.pdf
http://www.koinlocal6.com/media/lib/107/e/1/2/e12f2287-ce0b-48e0-8d85-e3955216ae1b/FULLORDER.pdf the restraining order was granted: his reason listed for asking for the RO: Terri was tried to hire someone to kill him
bbm as for the sexting having nothing to do with the contempt charges I respectfully disagree
http://www.kptv.com/download/2010/0712/24229769.pdf
I have quoted a portion of the document:
"law enforcement has informed petitioners attorney respondent's stated personal relationship concerns and sexual overtures to Mr. Cook resemble those made to the man respondent previously attempted to hire to murder petitioner. Petitioner retains the actual cell phone related documents provided by law enforcement and asks that they be examined by the court in camera"
reason for RO: murder for hire
sexts to MC: according to LAW ENFORCEMENT similar to those TH shared with man she tried to hire to murder Kaine.[/QUOTE]
Where in the RO does it state that TH is not allowed to sext anyone? Where in the RO does it state that TH is not allowed to have any personal relationship? If it is not stated in the RO, then she cannot be held in contempt for it.
The Order for Contempt is not claiming that TH violated the Order in any way other than she alledgedly shared the sealed papers with others. The Order for Contempt is only asking for information specific to showing the "sealed" papers to others.
What does the alledged MFH have to do with TH alledgely showing anyone the sealed papers?
What does alledged personal relationship/sexual overtures have to do with showing anyone the sealed papers?
Where in the Order for Contempt does it ask the Judge to make any determination or any order regarding anything to do with MFH and/or personal relationship/sexual overtures?
The only issues that were necessary to support the Order for Contempt were how they know she allowed anyone to see and/or take pictures of the sealed papers.
IMO, all the rest was irrelevant to the Order for Contempt. Therefore, completely unnecessary and frivilous to the specific Order requested.
If (and I do mean IF) it's accurate that TH failed/refused LDTs or portions thereof, that the phone pings and her accounting for where she was do not match up, that she was uncooperative with LE to any extent...I think that's plenty for Kaine to suspect she at least knows something about Kyron's disappearance.
Remember, he is eyewitness and earwitness to some of these goings-on; it's not just a vague "maybe" from LE that he's basing his position on. As much as I love my husband, if I were to witness the above with my own eyes or hear it from his own lips, I would be devastated but would have to consider he might be involved.
Then to add insult to injury, if I were shown credible information that he were looking to have me killed....well, I just don't think I could trust him, regardless whether there were enough proof of that or involvement in my child's disappearance to get a conviction.
And if I felt that way, the thought of being married to him for even one more second would make my skin crawl, especially if I thought he had involvement in my son's disappearance. I wouldn't have to wait for him to be convicted of any charges to want to break my ties to him.
Not sure how someone can be expected to stand by their mate in such a situation, no matter how deeply you've loved them. Kaine is a far better judge of her character and whether she's being truthful with him and with LE than we are, not to mention he's been witness to the process and evidence, whereas we haven't been; so I have to believe he has reason to feel the way he does, including (IMO) a lot he's unable to speak about because of the ongoing investigation.
Hi, desquire. I agree for the most part with your post with a couple of exceptions.
Terri may be the only hurt financially, but I feel Kaine can make a case for continuing to be hurt emotionally by staying married to someone he (correctly or not) believes attempted to have him murdered,
Secondly, I'll give LE the benefit of the doubt that they're not complicit in embarking on a media crusade to persecute Terri.
BBM
Well, this argument could be used for this entire case, IMHO. We don't know that Terri was mouthing off about the LDTs, we take Desiree's word for it. We don't know that Terri was being self-centered and worried about herself in the days after Kyron was first missing. We don't know if Terri claimed that she was driving around to soothe baby K's earache, we take the reliable source's word for it.
If the basis for commenting or forming an opinion was based on what we heard and us being there when it happened, then none of us should have an opinion about any of this, IMHO.
IMO, I think it comes down to how strong your marriage truly is before a crisis. If your marriage is not strong to begin with, you will be quick to believe allegations. If your marriage is strong, you want real evidence that the person you married is someone you never knew.
IMO, anything that is not good enough as evidence in a court of law is not good enough for me. Innocent people are not only suspected but in some case convicted. Therefore, I would rather stand by my mate and find out LE was right then not stand by my mate and find out LE was wrong. Because I personally could not forgive myself if I turned my back on the person I loved and that person was innocent.
Hi Sherbie. I absolutely agree with you on the first point but the judge can grant the divorce and dissolve the marriage immediately given Terri's stipulation. It's just the division of property and custody that would be held in abatement.
On the second point, I'd really like to agree with you, after all, LE can't control what Kaine says. But when they continue to give him information and he continues to use it the way he has, my IUPG foundation starts to crack. For me, that foundation crumbled after the DDS statements. Kaine made some pretty serious accusations with little to back them up. If LE had made those statements heads would have rolled in the Sheriffs Office. I really expected LE to publicly distance themselves from the KH & DY press events after that but there they all were standing together the other evening.
I like the way you think though and admit that I might be too cynical at times.
Have any lawyers (esp. gitana) popped in on this thread yet? If not, let me just say that this is a very very normal request in divorce cases, nothing to see here, no reason to get excited. And such requests are routinely granted if the husband works and the wife does not.
Hypothetically - If she had nothing to do with Kyron then while she was also grieving the loss of Kyron, Kaine left her, took away her right to have any contact with her daughter, helped to destroy her publically so she had no one, but it is unfair to him that AFTER that she may have turned to another man for comfort?
IMO, For all intent purposes, they are both single. They are living separate lives. The only way not getting divorce right this minute harms either one is if they are planning to marry someone else.
Kimster closed the 350k Retainer thread and asked that we post here about it instead. Cypress, I was trying to answer your post when that thread was closed, in response to your comment that TH might have texted that it was gonna cost $350k vs. having actually paid that amount.
I don't think Kaine's atty would have had a basis to file the motion if they'd only had a text saying the case was going to cost "x" amount. I think there had to be an actual statement of money having been paid (or arrangements made therefor) in order for Rackner to have had the foundation to file the motion.
Maybe there's another option I'm not seeing, but I believe they must have a text saying or implying that TH had already actually paid (or made arrangements to pay) her atty. Thoughts, anyone?
Hypothetically - If she had nothing to do with Kyron then while she was also grieving the loss of Kyron, Kaine left her, took away her right to have any contact with her daughter, helped to destroy her publically so she had no one, but it is unfair to him that AFTER that she may have turned to another man for comfort?
IMO, For all intent purposes, they are both single. They are living separate lives. The only way not getting divorce right this minute harms either one is if they are planning to marry someone else.
The language used in the filing was "tendered payment" - which is legalese for "a binding commitment to pay" - if my research is correct.
IMO, TH's publically image has not improved in any manner nor has KH tarnished his own image. I personally have not ruled anyone out completely. That means I also have not ruled anyone in completely. My reasons are I have questions...questions that have not been asked and/or answered.
IMO, I still have questions. None of the speculation on the divorce is answering anyone of my questions. Yes it has brought up questions...questions of why is a divorce case being played out in public while Kyron is being lost.
I have to respectfully disagree.
I think it would be a gross injustice for either parent to be evaluated for the purposes of custody at this point. Gross injustice is an understatement really.
I believe that they're both under extreme stress right now and it would be reflected on their evaluations but I think that custody evaluations are pretty routinely done when the people involved are under extreme stress and not looking their best because the custody issues often tend to come up when there are crises in families such as an unamicable divorce, abuse or allegations of abuse, mental health problems, addictions etc.
Baby K needs her parents regardless, not just whenever it's a good time for them to be evaluated (if it's ever a good time).
BBM. Is it even possible to get all the divorce records sealed and have a secret divorce, if you happen to find yourself in a position to get divorced
when you're in the public eye, and have reporters digging up your stuff?
IMO, the court can be asked to seal anything. However, the minute I heard about the divorce/RO, I questioned why the divorce now. The RO was sealed. The RO would have given KH everything he has NOW without it being public. The media NEVER would have known to start "digging" for more.