Really? Kaine has to pay his legal fees? There isn't a single lawyer willing to do it pro bono? No offers at all, and if there were pro bono offers and he went with someone who charges-how is it Terri's fault that he can't pay?
I find it ironic that we can discuss how TH may have gotten 'gifts' to help with legal costs...but as of yet it seems a given that KH had to pay his lawyer? Does any of us really believe that he is having to pay for her, out of pocket and by himself? ":snooty:" Honestly, I would like to see if how KH is paying for it...pot meet kettle.
His little boy is missing, his wife may have hired a hitman; I HIGHLY doubt that there isn't a single person willing to jump in and lend a hand- babysitting, cleaning, cooking, LEGAL fees, household expenses ect. I would very, very surprised if no one offered. AND if no one offered, maybe WE should...heck if the guy pay his lawyer and keep up with household expenses, that is just sad.:waitasec:
Or, is it in his best interest to not have help, legally, in the long run?
RBBM: If this did happen, and LE has nothing BUT his word, then what happens to the RO that was based (at least partly on this). "well, someone told us he was asked to be apart of the MFH, but now he isn't talking.." Would the RO become invalid? Would there be any recourse for TH (assuming it was all a lie -I know BIG BIG assumption).
And lastly, I am really, really frustrated by all the criticism towards TH about her parenting of Baby K. First (before we found out about her being at the gym) it was "omg she must not be a very good mom to not even try and get custody-SHE'S GUILTY" and then after we had found out she went to the gym to get baby k and before she was served with the RO "OMG she tried to kidnap Baby K-SHE'S GUILTY" and then it was "We haven't heard anything from her, she should be contesting custody, SHE'S GUILTY" and now, that she is doing something (well at least her lawyers are) its "This is just a play by her lawyers, she doesn't really care about anyone/anything-SHE'S GUILTY":banghead:
Maybe she is, IMO she is, but that isn't based on her interactions with/ or non-interactions with Baby K. I know people who hate their spouse (and exes) but would never harm a hair on their child's head. Is she guilty? Time will tell, but it would be nice to know what we expect of her if she isn't guilty and stick with it. [Please note I am not criticizing anyone! That is not my intention!]