cavalierlover
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2010
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
If the MCSO was conclusively convinced Kyron and TMH were both in the school on June 4th, why then circulate the questionnaires seeking additional corroborating accounts from other adults and children confirming either or both were there that morning?
I suspect LE had one or more individuals (TMH herself; classmate "T"; PTA mother; etc.) placing either or both Kyron and TMH at the school but for some reason didn't consider same reliable.
Following circulation of the questionnaires, MCSO is once again confirming Kyron was last seen inside the school but do we know whether is was, indeed, Friday morning or could it have been Thursday when the science exhibit was set up?
EXIF data on the photographs would be helpful to establish when they were taken. But it is possible the photos were "photo shopped" to add Kyron. IMO it is possible TMH was at the school alone on Friday morning and that Kyron was never there on Friday.
I suspect LE had one or more individuals (TMH herself; classmate "T"; PTA mother; etc.) placing either or both Kyron and TMH at the school but for some reason didn't consider same reliable.
Following circulation of the questionnaires, MCSO is once again confirming Kyron was last seen inside the school but do we know whether is was, indeed, Friday morning or could it have been Thursday when the science exhibit was set up?
EXIF data on the photographs would be helpful to establish when they were taken. But it is possible the photos were "photo shopped" to add Kyron. IMO it is possible TMH was at the school alone on Friday morning and that Kyron was never there on Friday.