This is one of those times for me, that if Terri is guilty, she is both too cunning and too stupid for words, and I don't mean that as a flippant slam. I mean that literally. She planned this rather elaborate abduction and probably a murder as well, carried it out rather successfully thus far, but didn't envision that Desiree would come to Portland upon hearing her son was missing? It's just a little off, IMHO.
Also, what constitutes surprised? What is DY's interpretation of TH being surprised? Did Terri ask something along the lines of, "You're coming right now?" Is that the smoking gun with regard to this aspect of the case? The more and more this case relies on the nitpicks, the more and more concerned I become about the direction.
I don't want to delve into the rumor mill, but it's entirely possible that Desiree wasn't quite as involved in Kyron's life as we're being led to believe, and that Terri was simply surprised, in that moment, that she'd drop everything and come straight to Portland. I have little linkable evidence to back up the aforementioned opinion, but I will say that Kyron received a fishing pole for Christmas and TY said he'd been planning to finally take Kyron on fishing trip so he could use his new fishing pole. If you're actively involved in your stepson's life, six months is a long time to wait to take a little boy fishing to use his Christmas present. If Terri was in TY's position, she'd be crucified for how inattentive she was of him and how she didn't care enough to take him fishing so he could use his Christmas present.
I'll just go ahead and duck the tomatoes.
I don't see a focus on "nitpicks". Yes, there are little pieces of info or innuendo or trivia that may or may not be related or relevant to Kyron's disappearance. But why do you think that's what the case is based on? Is it possible that the investigation into TH is based instead on this?:
1. TH apparently has stated that she conveniently was driving around rural roads with a sick baby, for a few hours on the very day Kyron went missing. Thus, she is able to account, without any back up, for crucial hours during which he could have hidden something. Also, although the baby was so sick that TH had to drive her around to soothe her for a few hours, TH was able to, directly afterward, take the baby to the gym daycare.
2. TH failed, reportedly, her LDTs.
3. TH gave up her custodial rights to her baby, not even willing to ask for visitation, because she could not risk incriminating herself in a civil case with criminal implications. Further, TH did not contest the RO request at all, and agreed to move out of her home. I keep hearing how TH was kicked out of her home and that her baby was "taken" from her. But she did not fight the allegations or the request, so I think she willingly gave up these things. Why, if she is not hiding something?
4. TH reportedly had a torrid affair of sorts with some guy, only 3 weeks after her son went missing, able to sext and send sexually explicit images by the hundreds, instead of being so scared and grief-stricken that she could not even move or talk or eat - the way most parents of missing children feel.
5. A GJ has been convened to determine whether TH (not MC, not DS, not DY, not Kaine, etc), will be indited.
6. TH retained a criminal attorney and has refused to speak to LE since.
These things, as a whole, are huge. I don't care about affairs or how the mother felt or Kaine or whether she went to the gym after Kyron went missing, was flippant on FB after he went missing, or how she hugged DY at the presser and DY didn't like it, or that she drives a red mustang or possibly took steroids in the past. None of that is important, IMO. They are all red herrings. But the above points, especially taken together, those are the key. To me, picking out some random issue, such as who DY immediately wanted to speak to when determining her son was missing, and saying this is what the case is based on, ignores these huge, major issues. JMO.