Zak
Active Member
its always nice how RDI chooses to characterize these events as if its all factually known, put it in some ridiculous context, and then blame IDI as if we came up with it. Thats just too funny.
You're making yourself sick with YOUR OWN characterization, not mine, based on what you think you know but really don't. This is true because your sources are hearsay: the tabloids and books written clearly before all the facts were in.
I'm told by several not over-the-edge RDI that the DNA "could" belong to an intruder. DNA is very important evidence in any crime, therefore the opinions you cling to so much are largely obsolete because they were formed before important evidence was known.
I'm not blaming IDI as if they came up with all of this. I just don't understand how it can be believed that an intruder/kidnapper did all of the things that I listed. It appears that you won't believe that any of what I listed actually happened until you see a report on it, but several things did happen that we know are factual and not hearsay:
She was wrapped in a blanket.
She was wiped off and redressed.
The window grate was put back in place.
There was a bowl of pineapple and a glass from tea on the table and she did have pineapple in her at autopsy.
The pad was given to LE from the hall table.
Would you agree that we know these to be true and factual?
I am one of the RDI's that have said that there is a chance that there was an intruder. Until we find the killer then noone knows 100% who did it. You can't say 100% that it was IDI and I can't say 100% that it was RDI. The touch DNA cannot be dated, so until a match is made then noone has been excluded as far as I am concerned. You on the otherhand choose to believe that the DNA is 100% proof of IDI and refuse to take into consideration any things that we RDI just can't believe that an IDI would have done that night. Any proof offered is considered hearsay or not factual. Well, thats what I consider the DNA to be hearsay and not factual. Until a match is made then the touch DNA means nothing to me.