faefrost
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 2,285
- Reaction score
- 0
http://www.wesh.com/download/2011/0216/26889138.pdf
Okay - I just tore out some of my hair and I really need to keep what I have left.
JB just filed a motion to strike the State's motion to strike the defense's late witness list.
In it, he says the diary is from 2003 and the state was unable to prove that it was not from 2003.
He also whines a lot about the the state not going to him and asking the reasons for filing the list late. Aren't the reasons supposed to be part of the filing? Why should the state have to go to him and ASK for info he should be including??
Am I missing something? help, please -
.
Ummm? Oh My!
Even after almost three years of horrid and incompetent motions, Jose still manages to raise the bar each time. I mean wow! Just wow! Apparently nobody bothered to teach Jose that when you are filing 6 months past the deadline the opposing side does not have to show in what way they are prejudiced. Rather you have to show the reason for the late filing, in your initial motion.
Oh and Jose, maybe if you want the opposing council to play nice and actually talk to you about things on the phone, you might want to consider refraining from continuously falsely accusing them of crimes or gross misconduct in public interviews and court filings. Just a thought.