sorrell skye
Former Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 6,684
- Reaction score
- 7,007
Snipped from transcript of SA's KTAB interview February 7, Part 1:
"I got to my moms house that day, and I got on the internet, looking up unemployment to see if I could get, you know, an unemployment check till I could get back on my feet and everything..."
Well, I guess we know @ least one of the reasons LE seized SA's mother's computer.
I wonder what the computer forensics investigators found? If SA was truly online December 27 "looking up unemployment", the browser history/temporary files log will either prove or disprove his claim.
In his interview, SA didn't state a specific time of when he was online. And then are those pesky cell phone records.
From the SW Affidavit:
Telephone records obtained by investigators show ADKINS cellular phone was using Verizon cell tower number 724 on the tower northern coverage area transmitter which is located at coordinates 32.41262 -100.86900 in the area of Colorado City, Texas from 6:35am to 6:56am with a break in usage until 9:38am thru 2:40pm when records indicate ADKINS phone was in the area of Big Spring, Texas by pinging Verizon cell Tower #730 coordinates 32.22156 -101.45867 which captured all phone calls from 9:38AM until 2:40PM on the northwest coverage area transmitter. This would be the Verizon tower that someone using a Verizon cell phone at 2807 Apache Drive in Big Spring, Texas. which is Shawn ADKINS mothers residence.
There was a break in usage of over 2 1/2 hours - from 6:56 a.m. to 9:38 a.m.
According to BD's 1/31 Timeline, SA arrived @ his mother's house between 7:30 - 8:00 a.m.
According to SA: "I went to Big Springs, to my mothers house, and I made calls on my cell phone to my mom, letting her know that I quit my job and everything..."
SA didn't state what time he arrived @ his mother's house, nor did he state what time he called his mother.
It would be interesting to know the browsing history of December 27 on his mother's computer to see how it compares to the cell phone records & with the statements of SA & BD.
I suspect, as with everything else in this case, there are glaring inconsistencies.
"I got to my moms house that day, and I got on the internet, looking up unemployment to see if I could get, you know, an unemployment check till I could get back on my feet and everything..."
Well, I guess we know @ least one of the reasons LE seized SA's mother's computer.
I wonder what the computer forensics investigators found? If SA was truly online December 27 "looking up unemployment", the browser history/temporary files log will either prove or disprove his claim.
In his interview, SA didn't state a specific time of when he was online. And then are those pesky cell phone records.
From the SW Affidavit:
Telephone records obtained by investigators show ADKINS cellular phone was using Verizon cell tower number 724 on the tower northern coverage area transmitter which is located at coordinates 32.41262 -100.86900 in the area of Colorado City, Texas from 6:35am to 6:56am with a break in usage until 9:38am thru 2:40pm when records indicate ADKINS phone was in the area of Big Spring, Texas by pinging Verizon cell Tower #730 coordinates 32.22156 -101.45867 which captured all phone calls from 9:38AM until 2:40PM on the northwest coverage area transmitter. This would be the Verizon tower that someone using a Verizon cell phone at 2807 Apache Drive in Big Spring, Texas. which is Shawn ADKINS mothers residence.
There was a break in usage of over 2 1/2 hours - from 6:56 a.m. to 9:38 a.m.
According to BD's 1/31 Timeline, SA arrived @ his mother's house between 7:30 - 8:00 a.m.
According to SA: "I went to Big Springs, to my mothers house, and I made calls on my cell phone to my mom, letting her know that I quit my job and everything..."
SA didn't state what time he arrived @ his mother's house, nor did he state what time he called his mother.
It would be interesting to know the browsing history of December 27 on his mother's computer to see how it compares to the cell phone records & with the statements of SA & BD.
I suspect, as with everything else in this case, there are glaring inconsistencies.