2011.03.04 Motions Hearing - #2 (PM)

[logicalgirl]

No.........you are not.

I don't think that he was sincere at all.

I mean really - take a look at all the times he has been turned into the Bar, how long it took it be approved to practice law in the first place.

I would have thought that the 8yr wait on that alone would have given him an appreciation of what he held his hand.
Apparently, not, IMO.

Today were just "words".
In one ear, straight out the other, no stopping inbetween.

He might "behave" for one or two more times in court, but, he won't be able to maintain any new and improved appearances.
And, that is saying nothing in regards to his snarky e-mails and no reply phone calls.
JMO ~

Yes, I agree and I'm thinking Mason wrote that speech for him.....

 

[LolaMoon08]

Baez filed this in open court today.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/72841857/20110304-Correspondence-To-Court--Jose-Baez

Now... what is a gas chromotagraph (smell of decomposition??) and a laser induced break down spectroscope?

 

[logicalgirl]

Baez filed this in open court today.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/72841857/20110304-Correspondence-To-Court--Jose-Baez

Is that what Dorothy Simms wrote? I think...I understand what she said....:waitasec:

 

[OneLostGrl]

Baez filed this in open court today.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/72841857/20110304-Correspondence-To-Court--Jose-Baez

Is that a joke?

 

[LolaMoon08]

:floorlaugh:

Is that a joke?

I don't know why I thought your comment was so funny, but it made me laugh out loud.

 

[BigFatMommyDog]

Is that a joke?

Desperate times, desperate measures and all that...

 

[Sooner Fan#1]

I can front ya a xanax and raise ya up to a morphine if needed!:woohoo:

Morphine is good! I have bedsores on my butt from sitting for 3 days! And may have slept 6 hours total this week! Xanax I got...

 

[LolaMoon08]

So the defense is not going to challenge the use and validity (ability?) of the "gas chromotagraph" or "laser induced break down spectroscope."

Are they two different machines or is this two different descriptions of the same machine?

Was this to be addressed at the Frye hearing??

Again, what are these things and what evidence do they belong to?

ETA: However, they are going to challenge these "machines" findings.

I hope I have that right!

 

[momtective]

Baez filed this in open court today.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/72841857/20110304-Correspondence-To-Court--Jose-Baez

Looks like KC's handwriting.

 

[TallyHo]

Looks like KC's handwriting.

I agree 100% - it looks like Casey wrote one of her attorney's statements down verbatim (Sims??)

 

[LolaMoon08]

I agree 100% - it looks like Casey wrote one of her attorney's statements down verbatim (Sims??)

Is that allowed? :waitasec:

 

[logicalgirl]

Looks like KC's handwriting.

It is Dorothy Sims - it is part of the motion against the motion to suppress for Frye - Baez if you remember had no additional information for those motions that are to be heard in the Frye hearings - HHJP was accepting this handwritten note until Monday, when a formal one will be filed, rather than move ahead with the motion.

It was all conciliatory just the court could proceed.... You will see it in the last 15 minutes of today's hearing.

 

[ZsaZsa]

Is that allowed? :waitasec:

It's not ICA's writing, it is Sims her attorney, she wrote it down for Baez and handed it to HHJP.

 

[2goldfish]

I was just wondering that as well. I just finished watching YM's testimony...and the final "denied" of JP's rang loud in my ears (when LDB asked for questions to be stricken). I hope that the judge realizes the timeline of events...that Casey was arrested after tracking down her "leads". YM came on the scene late in the game (after the handcuffing episode)...it was his resposnibility to hear everything firsthand before making a decision. He probably did suspect he wasn't hearing the truth...but how could he have known that an initial call about a stolen car would lead to the murder of a precious child. IMHO he believed that he was faced with one stubborn and strong willed young lady who was playing games with her mother.

BBM

ITA and IMO it shows very clearly in the interview at universal - even though they'd just walked the hall with her til the end and KNEW she didnt work there, that everything she'd just thus far was a lie, the continued to questions her as if her story had truth ie asking her what time she went to work after dropping caylee off at "zanny's" (dont quote me, I havent heard it in ages but that's the gist)

I thought then and still think that LE at the time just could not grasp what ICA was up to, obviously they wanted caylee alive and ICA's behaviour didnt gel with anything they had ever seen before. I dont think they suspected caylee might really be dead until they actually took the car. and the reason they delayed taking the car was for the same reason IMO. ICA's behaviour did not gel with being the mother of a missing or hurt child.

 

[A_News_Junkie]

That was such a nice post. I have been here everyday since I did a search on this case on the internet when the story broke. Back then, there was a "Newbie" forum that I stayed in because I was too scared to come post on the big boy/girl board!
I just don't know what I am going to do with myself after this case is over and I can't "come" here every day....

OH NO YOU DON'T --- we will get you TOTALLY OBSESSED on another case!

NOBODY IS GOING ANYWHERE!

 

[Capri]

It's not ICA's writing, it is Sims her attorney, she wrote it down for Baez and handed it to HHJP.

http://www.wftv.com/video/27081023/index.html

It's within the first 50 sec. of this video. Sims writes it, Ashton takes it, Baez signs it, and it is handed to Judge Perry.

 

[LolaMoon08]

Okay, I just watched a youtube video on "CG" also known as "Gas Chromatography."

Is it safe to say that the air samples are now admissable at trial and they will argue the "interpretation" of the "findings" and how they're "applied" at trial? Or are they going to do this at the Frye hearing? Challenge the interpretation?

I am confused because they agree that they are not challenging the "validity" of these two machines (The LIBS scared the crap out of me when I looked it up on youtube. It was like listening to a stun gun) as to their "ability" and their "findings."

BUT then they say that they will challenge the "interpretation" of the "findings" and how they are "applied?"

So what does this mean? Interpretation... I guess you can say is an opinion? So the defense is going to challenge what these machines "found" (volatile fatty acids?) and how that "applies" to this case? Applied to what?

ETA: I hope I didn't butcher this post too much... I am just confused?

 

[Tulessa]

Just caught a blip that Nancy Grace is going to be "breaking the Casey Case down" tonight for those of you that are up to it.

YES!! She said she would resume coverage as it neared trial!! :great::great::great:

 

[Searchfortruth]

Baez filed this in open court today.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/72841857/20110304-Correspondence-To-Court--Jose-Baez

This was actually filed with the court ? I feel like I'm loosing my mind ! :crazy:

 

[A_News_Junkie]

Baez filed this in open court today.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/72841857/20110304-Correspondence-To-Court--Jose-Baez

Since the mood of the day is to all get along, instead of commenting on the lack of maturity in her handwriting -- I will instead, say she addresses the court in a much more mature manner!

:innocent: