2011.04.15 Hearing Thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, Baez just called ICA "the defendant". First time I've heard that.
 
How do you plan to get around that Mr. Baez?


howdoyouplantogetaroundthat.jpg


I spoke too soon. JB is floundering to find a way to NOT answer the question posed by HHJP.
 
JB can't get his thoughts together. Gonna start begging in a minute. imo lol
 
JB doesn't know how to explain what they want to do because if he tells the truth, he knows his request is going to be denied. :denied:
 
pen click, pen click, pen click.

Looks like Baez had his favourite tipple this afternoon.

Not to stand up for JB (because I despise him), but I don't think he is the only one who's clicking. I watched while he was originally speaking, and his thumb wasn't on his pen, yet there was still clicking.

I wonder if the judge has something close to his mic also?
 
oh, oh oh, LMAO - the pen clicking is NOT Baez....wonder who is doing it, hope it is Judge Perry.
 
It sounds like JB is beating around the bush as to what they will be testifying to.
 
JB: different context it goes to rebutt. I can only assume where you are going judge. each expert was provided with ample a signifcant amount of information related to the case. I wouldn't say they are based exclusively on the information of that certain individual.

HHJP: if you look at the reports we talk about PTSD is that(my audio went out)

JB: the situation we have here is, because because a mental health defense is not being asserted and ICA has not been diagnosed as such or having some type of mental defect(quote: defect) experts will be discussing behavioral science.

they would be testifying to.

HHJP: what would they be testifying to?

JB: something in the alternative to the consciousness of guilt. a person can behave in a certain way and that does not speak to consciousness of guilt. this is all to rebut to something that may or may not be introduced.
 
JBP' "Mr Baaaaaaez I've read the depositions...what are they testifying to?"

Baez"ahhh, ummm, well judge..I think...
 
Baez trying to say; someone "can behave in a certain way and not be guilty of something."
 
HHBP - what MH diagnosis will these experts testify to? Look @ the reports - PTSD? is that what they will testify to?

JB - wants a moment to collect thots - situation here is because a MH defense is not being asserted and defendant has not been diagnosed as such with having some mental defect. there are aspects of behavioral science - whether that comes up with a label - sound psychological expertise

HHBP - what will they testify to

JB - they will testify to the alternative to the consciousness of guilt - multiple reasons this could be used to assert or tell the jury - this is all to rebut a specific thing that may or may not be introduced. it goes to situation of consciousness of guilt - it should be outlined - we would like to offer that it does not and cannot provide an answer to the jurors.

HHBP - what is it the experts will testify to?
 
Hey Jose, you want to rebut something? Put Casey on the stand to do it herself!
 
CJBP is NOT letting him off on this. Trying to get him to identify what the heck exception he is asking for...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
296
Total visitors
464

Forum statistics

Threads
609,437
Messages
18,254,103
Members
234,653
Latest member
Cheyenne233
Back
Top