TotallyObsessed
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,096
- Reaction score
- 1
I scored 80% correct. This would disqualify me from jury participation I suspect. Although...I was proud of myself.
:great:
80% for me too!
I scored 80% correct. This would disqualify me from jury participation I suspect. Although...I was proud of myself.
:great:
I'm from the south and I HATE grits! Unless it is at 3:00 a.m. at a Waffle House. Oh, you northern people don't have Waffle Houses, do you? That's the usually the only place open at 3:00 a.m. when you are trying to ... get something on your stomach after a night of partying!
me too, me too, I got cheese & onion pasties in the oven, all premade processed junk too. :sigh:
I thought something about nuts but couldn't imagine where the fluff was coming from lol
OK, it's obvious we don't have any southerners on the board or in the media! He said grits for a gristmill! (In his lovely southern speech I love)
Grits is a type of maize porridge and a food common in the Southern United States consisting of coarsely ground corn, traditionally by a stone mill. The results are passed through screens, with the finer part being corn meal, and the coarser being grits.
Many communities in the South had a gristmill until the mid-20th century, with families bringing their own corn to be ground, and the miller retaining a portion of the corn for his fee. Grits aficionados still prefer stone ground grits, although modern milling tends to prefer faster methods.
I'm from the south and I HATE grits! Unless it is at 3:00 a.m. at a Waffle House. Oh, you northern people don't have Waffle Houses, do you? That's the usually the only place open at 3:00 a.m. when you are trying to ... get something on your stomach after a night of partying!
nevertheless. all that will be for naught.
casey jordan (IS TH's) just loves JB
not so fond of HHJP
blames this mess on HHJP
Sorry for my slip of the tongue in my rant !! I do recognize that the defense has nothing to prove per se, but they do have a legal obligation to defend their client to the best of their ability .. I guess my point was, IF your client is as innocent as you say she is, if you have a "bombshell" that will provide the reasoning behind what she did and why she did it, then STOP abusing the system and let's get down to business. This is a VERY expensive game they are playing with my hard earned dollars, as well as many others here I'm sure. I have a child in the public school system here in Florida who is losing courses and activities left and right. I have 2 siblings in LE in Orlando (who, by the way are VERY good friends with the lead investigators on this case - and VERY tightmouthed too - darn!!) watching their budget get cut left and right and it just frankly makes me ill to watch. Again, NO jury is ever going to be perfect and that's what I meant about standing on the strengths of your case, be it prosecution or defense. Yes, I definitely believe you have a right to exclude those who are obviously not good potential jurors, but to play such games is just plain wrong.
I missed one.. the price of her christmas dinner... wow it must have tasted really bad for 82 cents!
I have been reading too much, I swear I saw "panties"-I had to stop and reread quickly-did not compute.:waitasec::floorlaugh:
Are they at lunch now? I can't find video
Are they at lunch now? I can't find video
Mike Thomas' quiz: Are you an expert on the Casey Anthony case?
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...hony-trial-quiz-05162011,0,7694300.triviaquiz
http://media.photobucket.com/image/fluffernutter/edwardlover_18/fluff.jpg?o=11
here is one for you Darnudes