2011.05.25 TRIAL Day Two- (Morning Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Isn't there a less public entrance to the courthouse? Why did they walk straight through the media-- because they wanted to, imo.
 
The State ought to start asking everyone if they were present when KC wrapped duct tape around her baby's face.
So clever on Baez' part- can't prove a negative... hope the juror's listen to the evidence and don't get led down this false path of 'reasonable' doubt. A reasonable person will still look at the totality of evidence and see what KC truly is. THe Blockbuster video should be huge for them. To see a supposedly 'good' mother out acting like that hours after her child supposedly drowned in a tragic accident cannot be explained away by claiming she is a sexual abuse survivor used to living a lie.

BBM: THAT. Yes. Maybe Jeff will start on that... lol
 
ok - a bit o/t when the camera focuses on the eagle during recess all I can think of is the "Eagelman!" commercial from years ago.

As for ICA, that little pouty moue (as I've been describing it)appears to be starting to etch lines in her face and that reminds me of the character makeup used in a famous movie staring Charlton Heston that involved simians. IYKWIM

That's it! I've been trying to place the "look"! Thank You!
 
Wonder what that was all about...
traildayone20.jpg
 
I think I would lay my head low to if anyone ever accused of me something like that. The embarssment, anger of knowing I didn't do it and how Baez Directed the penis comment I'd want to spit a few bad words at him . It has to be tough on George facing everyone after those comments. I'm one who doesn't believe she was sexually abused.

I'd hope that his LE training and CA's nursing background would help them understand they aren't to take accusations flung at them by sociopaths too seriously. Serenity now GA!!

Holding his head up high is a signal to the jury he's not ashamed and likely innocent of ICA's claims. MO
 
I'd have a hard time not getting physical with JB, lol.
 
I agree the SA needs to stay the course and ignore the drowning stuff. They already got GA the one witness other then ICA to the "inccident" to admit it never happened. That and the DT never pressed GA about it.

I agree. The jury was probably shaking their heads in massive confusion that JB did not question George about these accusations. It made no sense at all to do all that finger pointing and then... NOTHING! NADA! ZIP! I think he lost his shock and awe moment and he will not be able to regain it once the state lays down their case. It almost looked like JB was backing away from his story.
 
Ugh I'm so annoyed by the mere presence of JB. Even watching him over at the SA table his cockiness is nauseating.

It's exaggerated because he's lacking.... he's overcompensating. Like men with trucks as tall as the Space Needle and loud exhaust pipes are compensating for their lack of.... well... you know....
 
I have a question.

If Baez knew all along that Caylee was dead, wouldn't he be required to tell someone of authority that the child was no longer living?

Could he really as an officer of the court continue holding that information back even during the time when they were still searching for her body? :waitasec:

I am not saying he would have to tell the who what when and where either.
No, Baez is not required to tell anyone what his client told him about Caylee's death. He can hold that information back, even when the searchers were looking for Caylee.
 
Just FYI for anyone looking for links to live feeds, they are always posted at the begining of these daily threads. They are also in the "Media Links" sticky section.
 
If I remember correctly, the morning that Baez is saying Caylee drowned, don't they have phone records from Casey's phone and the A's home. Would this not disprove the "drowning" theory.
 
:banghead: IS is making a big deal out of the fact that NL could not remember the exact date of the hot body contest. :waitasec:

Who cares? It has been 3 years. I wouldn't remember the exact date either!

Geez, WHAT is their deal? I cannot believe that they've thrown out their credibility trying to prop up this DT. I had such respect for them back in the Peterson trial days. Now - zero respect.

Is it because Baez will be their newest employee at the conclusion of this trial and they need to prop him up?

Or is it because the DT has promised the EXCLUSIVE interview with ICA if she is acquitted (lol I know)? If so, they are in for a rude awakening because Baez has apparently promised that same exclusivity to WESH, 48 Hours and Geraldo.
 
I think the state is doing well to leave jose to his pitiful defense and his "were you there" question...

there is enough evidence to show what really happened... and it wasn't that... best to let him have the rope to hang himself with

moo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
182
Total visitors
284

Forum statistics

Threads
608,897
Messages
18,247,372
Members
234,492
Latest member
Michael1
Back
Top