sleutherontheside
Retired WS Staff
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 9,874
- Reaction score
- 1
BAM....no perspective.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is making sense to me - there would be more chloroform in the air than on, say, a piece of fabric.
Baez is doing an excellent job with this witness.
- he has established that the leval of cloraform found is consistant with cleaning fluid.
- the witness has directly contradicted Dr Vass's testimony regarding "shockingly high" levals
- regardless of your personal feelings regarding him, this is very effective. The question is - will he quit while he's ahead.
But, wasn't there posts earlier that said chloroform was heavier than air and would settle to the bottom and therefore be more concentrated in the carpet on the bottom of the trunk than in the air above it?
I'm a little worried here. Dr. Vass testified that the "point of origin" of the chloroform WAS the piece of the carpet. Now, from what I'm getting - this Dr. is saying there were only low levels of Chloroform on the trunk liner.
No doubt, this is a circumstantial case - there's no tape of the act, but there isn't in many cases. The SA is asking
2 + x = 4
solve for x