2011.06.14 TRIAL Day Eighteen (Afternoon Session)

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
My son re-wore all of his smaller size shorts after being potty trained. There was never any evidence of a disposable diaper being found. I know they deteriorate faster but just thinking that old shorts would easily fit......
Casey supposedly kept a bag in the car with some things for Caylee. I could easily see how the shorts could have been in there. But, Cindy also testified that Caylee was heavier in the pic. She probably thinned out with height.
A pull-up was found at the scene.
 
They didn't know before Caylee was found to ask Cindy about a pooh blanket. Since she noticed it in May I doubt Cindy connected it had anything to do with Caylee's disappearance in July.

Right, the warrant just jogged her memory when she saw it. I feel thats completely understandable.
 
Jury wants to see 313..the heart sticker found at the scene?

The FBI analyst said the heart sticker residue was the size of a dime.

The puffy sticker is bigger.


the ruler with the pink sticker showed to to be just under a centimeter wide....roughly dime size? do I misremember the size of a dime?
 
:floorlaugh: And the Pooh Blanket ... and how did Kronk get the heart sticker from ICA's bedroom ? ? Hmmm ... let me guess . . . :floorlaugh:

I know...
the escort service searches or whatever they were....ICA did them because she was supplementing her income...errr...I mean the money she took from CA and Kronk was one of her clients and she had him in the home.
 
I don't see bashing - just fact-stating IMO[/QUOTE]

Not facts just personal opinions IMO that is why we have the sideboard thread.
 
LDB is about to read a few stipulations regarding the evidence that is coming up.
 
I seem to recall other witnesses saying I don't know, don't recall etc. Does that make them liars? Or do we accept that memory is not always as perfect as we would like it to be?
JMO

:waitasec: I am not sure which other witnesses you are referring to ...

But when it comes to the A's, NONE of them have been TRUTHFUL about anything regarding the past 3 years ... they have absolutely ZERO CREDIBILITY in my book !

The A's did EVERYTHING THEY COULD to THROW ANYONE and EVERYONE UNDER THE BUS -- except their daughter !

They destroyed evidence and obstructed justice for Caylee !

MOO MOO AND MOO !!!
 
What? JB is saying her shorts didn't fit? :waitasec:

So JB is going with the shorts don't fit, you must acquit. Just as adult clothing, Im sure there are children's clothing that run larger than others. Especially is stretchy as mentioned.

He is truly a piece of work. :banghead:

And now we know what she signed at opening of court.
 
My almost 6 year old just dressed himself in some 3T shorts he found in the closet the other day. LOL And amazingly they weren't that tight!


My 8.5 yr old did that with an older pair of size 7 pants from a halloween costume recently. (and he is long since out of a size 7)

If the shorts were a material that stretches with an elastic waist it would be very easy to put on a pair of shorts 1 size too small.

Where was JB going with saying whoever dressed Caylee didn't know what size clothes she wore and who is to say CAYLEE didn't put those shorts on herself? At just shy of 3 she would have been at an age to insist on dressing herself sometimes and may have insisted on picking out her own clothes and not always made the best choices on what clothes to wear. anyone who is a parent would know that!

jmo
 
Oh goodness, my kids always wore smaller bottoms than tops. Not to mention, depending on designer one 24mos could be larger/smaller than another. This means nothing despite what JB was trying to get CA to imply.

Yes, I agree! Also, at the time Caylee was chubbier in that photo and fit into the shorts and as she thinned out she was still able to fit into the shorts.

My 2 year old daughter is wearing her clothes from last summer when she was one, which are sized at 12 month, 18 months. 2T is way to big for her although some 2t clothes do fit her.

With my kids they also wear smaller bottoms and bigger tops too.
 
Okay now they are bringing in the pix of the duct tape at the "command center" by WFTV.
 
The shorts could feasibly fit Caylee at both points in time, considering whether she was wearing a diaper or not, and further, what kind of diaper she was wearing (disposables are slimmer than cloth).

She wore pull-ups I believe. Cindy was toilet training. There's no evidence that ICA was.
 
Here we go! The posters on TV!

Thank G-d somebody had the idea to bring up this evidence. Yay for WFTV!
 
I have ZERO clue what is going on right now. If anyone is more with it than me - pls explain LOL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
147
Guests online
470
Total visitors
617

Forum statistics

Threads
605,937
Messages
18,195,301
Members
233,655
Latest member
KY Cliffhanger
Back
Top