Quiche
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2009
- Messages
- 9,130
- Reaction score
- 503
Whoa, the Eikenblooms weren't told to write a report.
Holy heck, that's a bombshell.
Whoa, the Eikenblooms weren't told to write a report.
During the desperation phase.....February was a very eventful month for JB also, that's when he spoke to TL again via the phone & came up with the "molestation" charges against GA. Unbelieveable!Eikenbloom July 2010, retained by the Defense.
I don't understand why everyone thinks that a dog possibly burying a bone is so outragious???? It is the SA theory that this was a trash dump site. Dogs do hunt out such site and dogs do bury bones. It is also the SA theory and evidence that the bones were scattered BY ANIMALS. What is so outragious?
Possibly, maybe, it could have, I don't know, dog ate my homework.I didn't say the skull was buried by the dog. Who's to say the dog or dogs or coyotes or other animals that may have buried the hip bone just happened to pick just the hip bone. As far as the leaf litter, as per the witness it is possible the leaf litter as well as wet humid conditions, winds, manipulation of the evidence when the skull was removed by the crime scene personnel could have justified the position and evidence of the skull. Per the witness, it's possible just as it's possible an animal buried the hip bone. JMO
Uh oh...JB in trouble again. I think serious trouble.
If he wasn't told to write a report, why not penalize JB?