2011.06.28 TRIAL Day Thirty (Morning Session)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I really don't like Mr. Jordan, and never have. Ever. He inserted himself into this case from the very beginning. He was determined to make a name for himself. He conducted other searches on his own. He made sure he got himself on FOXnews.

He damaged the reputation of Texas Equusearch, he messed up the investigation. I am sure this has cost him a pretty penny both financially and personally.

He is no hero, imo.

I think it was very awesome of J.J. to offer himself as a volunteer in the search for little Caylee.
 


HHBP - Mr. Jordan you may step down for a moment and step outside...
Ms. Burdick - anything in addition to say
LDB -objection ...that was improper and counsel knew witness going to invoke 5th as that happened in the depo...

CM - sworn statement on 11/5/09 witness advised by LDb = gives immunity ....with him about his activity early on where they discussed with him that he broke the law - he knew he broke the law - and if he destroyed tape? he would break law again.....

CM looks for paper - statement 10/28/09 - tape recorded interview w/JJ and Corp. Edwards pg #34 ....acknowledge he recorded conversation and discuss how he did it....recorded surreptiously....his Atty recorded him without his knowledge ...giving a recording without this guys permission...broke the law don't break another by destroying it....recording him without knowledge - not to your benefit obviously go after me...

threatened with unlawful wiretap...then has immunity - he is not under prosecution....I (CM) have a right to ask him - he avoided it and took the 5th...did not expect him to take 5th @ that time his lawyer is sitting right there....if he has immunity then he would not have to plead 5th ....goes to crediblity -

LDB - Mr. Mason wasn't demonstrating there was a change between testimony he gave Nov 5,2009 and any other time...had to do with him elicit someone's 5th amend rights....Mr. Mason had inidicated to me ahead of time he would not be eliciting any questioning on the unlawful wiretapping.....

CM - the email in which he told Detectives on 12/13 the body was moved....today now he tries to testify it is all in conflict ...

HHBP - there is no requirement of him to invoke his 5th..

CM - I didn't ask him to take 5th....invoke his right to counsel....I asked him about his crediblity - he invoked here and now..

LDB - from time of depo until today...his suggestion now why he is changing testimony is without merit - told CM made a mistake - he told jury he made a mistake - he is not impeaching him on anything......

CM - diagrams ...we were not part of his depo....invoke 5th rights now or before.....you guys don't come after me I am on your team...he chose to invoke.

HHBp - Davis vs. Alaska - if pending criminal proceeding to issue of bias...

unlawful recording ...felony ....end of Oct 2009....he was granted use immunity for prosection for his statement only.....3 years for felony under 775.15 is the time limitations ..it is 2 or 3 year...it is a 3 year....

the proper procedure would have been simply profer to see if witness would invoke his 5th...it is proper to bring up that witness has been granted use immunity by SA...up to the SA to go into details of what he was given use immunity....may or may not have been a dastardly crime recording voice without permission...

HHBP to CM - what is your line of question regarding that particular issue.

LDB - we will move to stricken - impermissable..if he wants to ask related to bias....he is on redirect he is not on cross..

HHBP -




 
IIRC....it was decided by BOTH the defense PI and the prosecution that NO charges regarding this would be filed....
 
What is the outcome? HHJP said what would have been "proper" - okay fine, but that didn't happen - so what is the outcome? They can or cannot talk about his recording?
 
l_0329c5a208bcb5ee6ff20d91ce7493ec.jpg
 
LOL watch KC's face whenever she looks at Linda.
 
I hope he is able to tell everything then if he has to tell some
 
Bill Sheaffer:
You are not allowed to take the 5th in front of jury. You are not allowed to ask a question as a lawyer knowing that you are going to take the 5th. It's improper questioning
 
CM is cheatin - he knows that LDB can not bring out the recording, JJ commited a crime by illegally recording a defense PI - but now the Jury doesn't know what's up - who are the people , in movies, that usually take the 5th? Criminals
 
he should have sent the jury out for a smoke rather then just put them in their room
 
KBelichWFTVKathi Belich, WFTV
Jordan said he recorded conversation with defense investigator because he didn't trust the defense!

1 minute ago
 
I wish the state would let this in. JJ could then testify he did what he did because he felt the DT's PI was trying to tamper with his testimony, and he was doing it to protect himself. Let the DT object all they want, they brought this in. See how they like being dragged through the mud.
 
For the benefit of those who use these threads to follow the court proceedings after the fact, can someone explain what is happening?

People have written that it was legally wrong of CM to ask, others have written that HHJP has found in favor of the defense, and at this moment I am listening to an ongoing discussion that hasn't been resolved yet. Which is it??
 
MODS...site is not loading again...It's not advancing...I just got knocked out...same thing happened yesterday.....HELP! :floorlaugh:
 
I keep remembering that CM got so huffy during an earlier hearing and stated that he had never been held in contempt to the court....I would love to see that happen before this trial is over.

Actually I know CM is a good lawyer with a good reputation....I just don’t like what he pulled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
172
Guests online
282
Total visitors
454

Forum statistics

Threads
609,442
Messages
18,254,250
Members
234,655
Latest member
Scarytree
Back
Top