I think it's both.I suspect she thought about killing Caylee and her parents for awhile. I also think she carried out killing Caylee when she was confronted by Cindy.
While listening to the computer analyst talking about neck breaking and shovel ,I had this vision of ICA waiting in the garage on July 18th ,with the neighbors borrowed shovel,waiting for her parents to get home.I do believe she intended to kill them ,also. TonE probably texted her and she put it off.
That's completely in my imagination,but I it's not a stretch to believe,IMO.
Well one time, very long ago, probably when all of Lee's phone calls and visits were being released, Lee allegedly said to ICA...
"Is this like the last time"
I think that's one of the things that bothers me the most...all the unanswered questions...the biggest one being...WHY?
Can't believe we are down to closing statements. It's been a long haul my friends. I honestly don't know what I'll do with my time (and my work day--I'll actually have to work-YIKES!!). I'm so glad to see justice for Caylee. I'm sad to not be seeing Linda, Jeff and Frank on a regular basis. Oh, and his honor Perry and his staff.
I've been on this board for a while, longer than ICA's case, but man, what a journey we've come. I am so glad that closing statements will be on Sunday. I'll miss church for this one. I can finally watch and not have to hide the fact that I'm doing so and listen in on headphones!!
Here's to team Caylee and the SA and everyone who has fought to bring justice for Caylee. Cheers.
Oh, sweet child. Gone too soon.
Has this been posted yet? A passive aggressive ICA at the end of the day .
Calling all lip readers
http://www.wftv.com/video/28424275/index.html
Good heavens, darnudes, have you been to bed yet? And how the heck is your new pet possum?![]()
dangit I did too!FYI...I heard it as well
Was it said that they never did find any searches for chlorophyll on the computer?
Oh, sweet child. Gone too soon.
Here is the PROBLEM. The defendant has the legal right to tell their OWN story. The attorney works for them and answers to them. If she insists that her Dad raped her in the AM while she waited for the school bus, and she wanted the jury to hear about it, then Baez has no choice but to say it in his OS. If she tells her team that she and her dad found the child dead, but the meter reader stole the remains, AGAIN, it is out of the DT's control.
So that cannot go to Ineffective Counsel. If she was the one who wanted HER story told, then no legal action can be taken against that decision. In fact that was the ONLY decision the DT could legally take. Ineffective Counsel usually goes to some one who is negligent, and unprofessional in a massive way.
There is one thing that might point towards that IC appeal---that is the fact that the DT, apparently, never looked at the jailhouse tapes, and thus never had any of them redacted. That could have helped quite a bit because those tapes were devastating for the DT, imo. Once the jury sat through those they surely disliked ICA intensely.
This may have been posted already, but here's the back story behind the Judge's comment:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,711938-1,00.html