I am not going to say too much about this here because (a) I am not constantly at my PC (moving about atm); and (b) I realise that a lot of people on this board are heavily endeared to Jeff Ashton and don't appreciate criticism.
I will say this however:
(1) Ashton has done worse during the closing arguments, indeed, his laughing was less pronounced than it had been previously. JP should be looking at the entirety of this conduct because it affects KC's right to a fair trial (yes, she even she has that right). CM needs to keep this in account when asking for a mistrial. The appellate record doesn't seem to be well preserved on this point.
(2) Baez is <modsnip comment here> but Ashton should know better. He has been a lawyer for at least 20 years I assume. It was not needed.
(3) I am dissapointed that JP is (it would appear) considering doing contempt proceedings now. This should wait until after trial.
(4) I shudder to think what would happen had the camera's not been here. No proof. One attorney's word against another.