IzzyBlanche
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2009
- Messages
- 4,830
- Reaction score
- 20,977
What did he do? I didn't see anything.
Me neither.
What did he do? I didn't see anything.
T'es pas :loser:, et maintenant you have another tool to use in the next case that you help with here at WS. :hug:
I saw JB hug ICA yesterday after he finished his close.
Foghorn Leghorn- C. Mason
this one did. I thought :shocked2:
I watched it two more time and i think I saw what I saw
it is from Friday July 1-
somebody watch Jose and see if you notice anything he
should not have done with a camera on him.
http://www.wftv.com/video/28417815/index.html
which video?
oui, mon cher ami! Umm - did I mention I'm on the West Coast and my French is shockingly poor? Oh - you could never guess that??? :skip: :skip: :skip: ..................you are too kind! :heartluv:
Oh, I saw that hug. That was no biggie to me, looked like an arm around her, not a passionate embrace. IMO. The wftv video was ICA coming into court July 1. I was looking for something he did wrong on that one.
Where is the plus mark used in multi quoting. Just jumping off an up=thread post.
CFNews13Casey Casey Anthony News13
Special break special:Jurors head down to 21st floor to smoke. Wonder how many breaks they'll need during deliberations? #CaseyAnthony -fell
ATTENTION
uh....Do y'all want to have the Sidebar thread LOCKED on a day like today???
CUT OUT THIS TALK - the speculation about a sexual relationship or some nefarious intent between Baez hugging Casey after closing arguments today.
There is plenty to talk about. Find something else NOW.
ATTENTION
uh....Do y'all want to have the Sidebar thread LOCKED on a day like today???
CUT OUT THIS TALK - the speculation about a sexual relationship or some nefarious intent between Baez hugging Casey after closing arguments today.
There is plenty to talk about. Find something else NOW.
Thanks - Brilliant and well put!
( Re: O.J. I always said the same thing esp. about the Glove!)
Just one more thought before I leave you to decide who should play who in the upcoming movie, and I get on with the work of the day, which I have managed to ignore so far.
One thing that puzzled me as we drew close to the end of this trial and deliberations for a verdict.
Those who were really concerned about an outcome began to have fears we would see an outcome like the "OJ verdict".
I don't understand that comparison, because the exact opposite happened in the OJ case. The Defense was brilliant, there is not doubt of that. They took every opportunity to weezil into every loop hole, take advantage of every blooper of the SA, the CSI and a racist detective.
In the OJ case, it was the States Attorneys who were a complete disgrace. If you remember, they were in front of microphones spouting off every night of that case. Marcia Clark spent more time worrying about her media appearance and posturing in the courtroom than she did on her case prosecution. It truly was sloppy, the CSI's were sloppy, and have a racist detective impeached on the stand was another nail hammered home. But to allow a defendant to put on a leather glove that had been washed, and not fitted dry was the ultimate stupidity. All leather shrinks when wet and must be blocked or pulled onto a hand or block to fit it to size again. The SA lost that case and the OJ jury confirmed that fact.
In the prosecution of ICA, this SA has been tight, constantly on point, accurate and hard hitting. They stayed away from the soft he/she said points and stuck with the hard forensics. They have been brilliant and will not fail Caylee Marie Anthony. They will not fail.[/QUOTE]
BBM
I agree.