HHJBP: Are you saying that ICA did not have time to pause, reflect and form a new criminal intent for each one of those 4 separate acts?
EF: Yes - under Hamilton decision there has to be a separation of time, place or circumstances. This all occurred in one interview to not invoke double jeopardy.
HHJBP: Thank you Ms. Fryer. State?
LDB: Valdez and Anderson - these are not single acts - different core conduct. There is a temporal break between the lies. They occurred over the course of 3 separate statements - 1a.m., 4a.m. and 1p.m. Each lie is material to the issues. Each were intended to lead law enforcement on a wild goose chase. They are not degree variance and not a single act. Separate acts do not violate double jeopardy.
HHJBP: Their site?
LDB: An individual that was charged with 2 separate counts involving one shooting.