IfIMay
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 982
- Reaction score
- 3
I really would like to hear from the other jurors. They could have been the laid-back type but they could have also felt intimidated by the fact that these two jurors apparently had very strong convictions based entirely on not having an understanding of what the jury instructions were. Juror #3 appears to want to argue that fact. Sometimes it is easier to just give in that insist on getting some clarification. Defense did not bring an proof of any kind into that courtroom, just accusations. SA had all the science yet they based their opinions on "reading people", feelings that GA was guilty of something but they weren't sure of what and thought KC was "sincere" but found her guilty of four counts of lying to a police officer. FYI. I doubt the jury even knew those cans with the carpet samples were not in the room with them. jmo
If that's the case, then I really hope Caylee haunts them in their sleep. They didn't even give it a full day! After lunch one day, then verdict the next mid-morning? I have less respect for them than I do the ones that have spoken out. They KNEW it was wrong, but just went along. Now a little girl has no justice in this world. I really hope it weighs heavily on them. They failed Caylee. They failed the justice system. And they failed those that have to rely on it for justice.