2011.10.19 Former Friends Of DB Speak Out

[Seaturtle]

Sounds like she was sneaking into clubs to drink before she was of legal age, but of course that's something I think MOST teens do or may have tried to do at one point.

I would be halfway through a life sentence if that were a prison-worthy offense.:innocent:

 

[c@rol]

Rumor, perhaps. But I am ALL kinds of freaking out about the comments left by kc427311. Please don't let it be true.

Is there any kind of live feed of the house while they are searching???

 

[Velouria]

Yep...that was a waste of airtime. I was hoping she had some insight as to how DB was as a mother to her son. Any risky behaviours that she might have partaken in when he was an infant. Any obvious neglect.

Talking about how she was as a young teenage bride with no children is not at all useful in this situation IMO.

I hear you, Kamille. So far, the only thing DB appears to be guilty of is 1) drinking to excess and 2) being generally unlikeable. And unfortunately, that hasn't led us to finding Lisa.

 

[pistolina]

That was not worth reading. Why do reporters waste their time on this junk?

 

[Velouria]

I would be halfway through a life sentence if that were a prison-worthy offense.:innocent:

LOL :giggle: Me too, Seaturtle. And the funny thing was, I didn't even drink. I only wanted to get in to hang out with my friends and see bands.

DB strikes me as someone who has yet to accept the fact that she is now a MOM first, and a young adult second.

 

[JeannaT]

Worth Repeating.

They had to go all the way back to DB's teenage conflicts to find a conflict to report. Not that's some rock solid journalism right there.

MM hm. And they had to find girls who frequented bars underage WITH HER. Pot calling kettle black, looks to me.

 

[Abby Normal]

In 2003 DB would have been 17. She didn't have kids yet. So I don't really know what that blip was about, probably a mis relaying of information. Not the first time in this case.

 

[Katana]

Yes, I know there are two. I meant the older of the two boys. I was under the impression they were 8 or 9 and 6 years old. The six years old wouldn't have been born yet in 2003 and the other one would have been very little. Am I mistaken about their ages?

This is what I thought, too. So, either the 8/9 year old is Debbi's or she has another child we haven't heard about yet around that age...or the friend is making some stuff up. :waitasec:

 

[raeann]

They have had to dig all the way back to 03 to find anybody who would speak bad about her. Just sayin.....

Yes.....and she stated that their kids played together EVERYDAY......however that is blatantly untrue....DB's son is SIX YEARS OLD..... so logically he wasn't born till around 2005-- two years AFTER she said that the kids played together!!!!

 

[JeannaT]

This is what I thought, too. So, either the 8/9 year old is Debbi's or she has another child we haven't heard about yet around that age...or the friend is making some stuff up. :waitasec:

I think that last thing you just said.

 

[mck16]

Yes.....and she stated that their kids played together EVERYDAY......however that is blatantly untrue....DB's son is SIX YEARS OLD..... so logically he wasn't born till around 2005-- two years AFTER she said that the kids played together!!!!

Maybe she is thinking of someone else. All that drinking you know. lol

 

[eleni777]

In 2003 DB would have been 17. She didn't have kids yet. So I don't really know what that blip was about, probably a mis relaying of information. Not the first time in this case.

Whoever editied that segment did a pitiful job on the splicing...

 

[JeannaT]

Maybe she is thinking of someone else. All that drinking you know. lol

I wonder too if they've just gotten the wrong person. Deborah would have been 17, and presumedly in high school or at least not married with children yet. And children that are old enough to "play together" with other kids!

Weird.

 

[Katana]

Maybe the reporter got the friends' stories mixed up or the year wrong because the info about the husbands/kids are a part of the article and not heard from Shirley on the video. Someone's story isn't straight. That's for sure.

 

[Geralyn]

Perhaps the father of her oldest had child(ren) from a previous relationship that DB "mothered"?

 

[Gardenlady]

This is really some reaching here. Just like the "chequered past" report, this is nothing but trying to sling mud and hoping some of it sticks.

Painful to watch some of these media outlets try to dig up dirt. Equally painful is watching many commenters trying to egg the media on into doing it.

Everyone wonders why the attention is off Lisa? Here is your reason. Reports like these, and anyone who salivates over them.

 

[eleni777]

Maybe the reporter got the friends' stories mixed up or the year wrong because the info about the husbands/kids are a part of the article and not heard from Shirley on the video. Someone's story isn't straight. That's for sure.

The problem is that now this MISINFORMATION is out there for the uninformed general public to absorb as the truth...

 

[BritsKate]

Rumor, perhaps. But I am ALL kinds of freaking out about the comments left by kc427311. Please don't let it be true.

Is there any kind of live feed of the house while they are searching???

http://livewire.kmbc.com/Event/Live_Blog_Amber_Alert_Issued_For_Missing_10-Month-Old#ixzz1bEXymiac

 

[AnaTeresa]

This is really some reaching here. Just like the "chequered past" report, this is nothing but trying to sling mud and hoping some of it sticks.

Painful to watch some of these media outlets try to dig up dirt. Equally painful is watching many commenters trying to egg the media on into doing it.

Everyone wonders why the attention is off Lisa? Here is your reason. Reports like these, and anyone who salivates over them.

So very true. This is why I'm still sitting on the fence - because muckracking by the media is not evidence of guilt.

 

[Abby Normal]

"She was definitely an attention hound"

Oh realllly. An attention hound you say? :doh:

:floorlaugh: