Got ya but she changed her practice right?
Saw.less patients.
Gosh u pick me apart guys lighten up.
I understand u don't like the fact I think her husband may not have a hand in this but geee.
U all should wish he dosent for the sake of his kids.
I'm just trying to see when the money problems started and was it when she went holistic.
Eileen,
I'm responding here because I also responded to your earlier post on the question of holistic medicine. Please know that I almost never know the background or beliefs of the posters I'm responding to. In this case, I didn't know, or didn't remember, that you were a defender of Mark's innocence. I was too, initially, just because I'm naturally a contrarian and the natural, obvious thing is to suspect the husband, so I wanted to look at other possibilities, for example, human traffickers.
My point in responding on holistic medicine wasn't to attack you, or anyone else, but to defend Dr. Sievers. Remember early on when people claimed the Sievers were rolling in profits from the sale of supplements? I defended Dr. Sievers then, and did so again today when holistic medicine was suggested as the cause of her financial problems. I agree with others that it's tough to make money when you're spending an hour with a patient instead of 7 minutes, but I also think there's a market for that kind of care (I'm part of that market). I also know that spending that kind of time with patients appeals to quite a few doctors--for example, my MD stepson of 43 years is considering moving to an annual-fee "concierge" model that allows more time with patients, even house calls, albeit with many fewer patients.
And by the way, I did support Mark on his guns, even though I think it's almost inconceivable he's not guilty. It wasn't having a safe-full of old guns, or even modern ones, that made him a criminal.