I guess I haven't read that, and from Othram's website, it doesn't seem likely to me that that's what they did (given how they describe their mission and what they do).
Does anyone have a citation actually stating that Othram had possession of the sheath? Because from what I understand from their website and in talking to colleagues about what this place does, it appears to me that they only work with computerized results of data taking from many different kinds of evidence:
Othram is revolutionizing how forensic cases are solved, justice is served, and families are mended.
othram.com
It's state of the art sequencing, with some of the best "junk DNA" detection in the business, but I don't think we have any evidence that the sheath itself traveled to Texas. Or do we? Did I miss that? Is it just News Nation who says that?
There's no point to using the Othram data at this point - as they have better evidence, is what I'm saying.
I don't see how sending the results of the sheath DNA to Texas is relevant at trial, whatsoever (since they have other, better ways to connect BK to his own DNA).
It is not my understanding that the ID lab "found nothing." Does anyone have any MSM or other citation that says that, because it seems like a very important fact, if true and I find it very, very hard to believe it hasn't been covered in reputable local media.
IMO.