Well, IMO, nothing you say will matter to the jury, because they will recognize the ginormous holes the state has to fill.
They will absolutely see photos of the car. Then they'll hear an auto expert talk about how it's ludicrous for so-called experts to mistake an Elantra for a Sentra. They'll hear how it's a rookie mistake for them not to see that it was a 2015 Elantra. They'll hear that the 2015 Elantra became "the car" after BK came on the radar.
They'll see that BK's cell phone pinged in the neighborhood in a town that is 6 square miles. They'll have phone experts explain how using cell resources that provide coverage to the house doesn't mean he was necessarily AT the house.
They'll learn what touch DNA is and how it's framed innocent people in the past. They'll learn what a bloody crime scene it was, the worst LE had seen, per their own words, and wonder how he didn't get blood in his car, how he cleaned up so quickly after a brutal quadruple homicide in 15 minutes. They'll hear how the FBI disassembled the car. The brake pedals. The seatbelt button. All those little crevices, none of which contained any evidence. They'll hear how no victim blood or DNA was found in his apartment. They'll hear that LE initially didn't even see that "latent" print and that, (as far as we know), a pair of Vans were never taken from BK.
It's unrealistically optimistic to think this case is BARD based on what we know.
MOO.