As far as the whole stalking thing goes, imo what actually occurred at that hearing has been misrepresented and taken out of context. Also, BT's ref was "one of the victims" not "the victims".
Moo, the hearing was addressing facts of the then public record which was clearly taken to be the official public record, not the media as claimed by the D. BT was concerned that two of the survey questions suggested or referred to things reported in the media unrelated to the public record.
On top of that, the question re BK; stalking one of the victims was not even reported by the media. Imo BT said that the D's media/change of venue consultant should have known this ( given what he actually does as a profession no less!). It makes sense to me that BT was referring to the investigation LE conducted re reports KG may have had a stalker not long after the crime and before BK was even on the radar.
Moscow police say that the two men, who reportedly followed Goncalves into a business and as she returned to her car back in October, are not thought to be involved in the murder
www.independent.co.uk
As for whether the P will be presenting evidence of BK surveiling 1122 King Road in person in build up to crime , we will wait for trial. Nothing I'm aware of precludes it as a possibility moo.
I love how thanks to the D's behaviour in hearings ( ie Sy Ray coming in with all this mysterious hoo-ha re phone signals in what was a Motion to compel hearing and not an albi hearing) we have this lovely trial by media stuff going on. We don't even know at this point if Sy Ray will actually be used at trial to bolster BK's so called 'alibi'. Have my doubts if BK turned his phone off between 2.47 and 4.48am which is the critical time period. Moo
I'm minus a laptop atm so though I would like to post more, it's a pain doing this via phone so it will keep. Moo
www.wfmz.com
