GRT
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2020
- Messages
- 2,911
- Reaction score
- 24,537
I think he touched the sheath. I think he's the killer.MOO
Okay so show me a better study or source that proves mine wrong please?
Unless you have video of BK touching or holding the sheath you don't have anything showing me he did actually ever touch the sheath.
Has the defense said that it was BK's sheath or that he touched it personally?
Remember all they need is one juror to have reasonable doubt.
2 Cents
But, I have my doubts if the State is going to prove that with just one minuscule bit of touch DNA that doesn't even prove he touched the sheath.
AT will argue (MOO) that the jury is supposed to believe that BK violently murdered four people -- slashing, stabbing, and struggling with, and not one bit of his DNA was found elsewhere in the house? And none of the victims' DNA was found in his car or apartment?
That's what I think she'll say. Then, she'll prop Sy Ray front and center and he'll say the cellphone data is exculpatory.
I think the lack of DNA and the *issues* with the cell data could very well be from BK's criminal knowledge. Did he purposely leave the tiny spec of touch DNA on the snap? Did he hide his phone elsewhere while he did the murders? Who knows?
But, you're right about touch DNA. I researched that at length a few months ago.
I'm still leaning more toward a conviction, but it could go either way.