Sulamith
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2010
- Messages
- 2,809
- Reaction score
- 1,715
The pictures of his little neighbor girls using the bathroom and taking baths aren't exactly of "everyday poses." Hidden camera pictures of Susan changing in what she assumes to be privacy aren't exactly "everyday poses." If you have a reasonable expectation of privacy, then it is illegal to film you.
I have not read anything about a hidden camera. I see where SP filmed Susan in "everyday poses". But I also read where he filmed Susan and Josh kissing in their bedroom. Did they not close their door? SP states he saw Susan inserting a tampon. Was the door not closed? SP mentions that he filmed Susan at work. Did she not know or did he have some super lens on his video camera? IDK. I was thinking if there were hidden cameras all over his house then LE would have found them during their search and they would have pressed charges against SP for voyerism on Susan. But they did not because they could not determine that Susan was unaware that she was being filmed.
I would like to hear a better explanation of why SP was not charged with voyerism on SP. I know I never will but it is just interesting to me.