Babys' Daddy possibly putting up the bound?
As in Silver Creek? Larry Garrison's doing? I think it is!
I actually think LE HAS to provide security. :furious::furious::furious:
Every day there seems to another statement or event that shocks and angers us even more than the day before. I've come to realize that in THIS case, we need to expect it. Just before the announcement of the bond being posted, I put this response in the thread about Cindy's statement about TM and LP:
This mess is going to get a lot worse before the tide turns and the wheels of justice start turning.
We all need to be prepared (on a daily basis) for more and more shocking statements and revelations that will anger us. They just keep coming and we need to brace ourselves to that inevitability, while knowing that in the end, justice will be served.
If they were dumb enough to think it could not be traced back, yes, I do.
I already know the name of the Production Company, if I can confirm the tie, I'll post it absolutely.
As in Silver Creek? Larry Garrison's doing? I think it is!
LOL, bad words in a foreign NEVER sound bad to me! Give it a shot, gigi2009!
I used words that may not be suitable for the under 16 crowd!
I hope everyone will voice their opinions!
Whoever did this has a lot of money lying around. She is going to be charged with murder and she will spend a good looooooong time in prison and this money just basically was thrown out the window. IF I were going to throw that much money out the window, I'd have thrown it on the front seat of Tim's vehicle. I am sick!
I'm sorry, but that is not correct. The bondsmen DO get the $50K back. If the defendant shows up in court, then the court does not keep any part of the bail money. It is all refunded to whoever paid it.
Say your imaginary cousin Fred gets himself arrested. His bail is set at $1000. If you want to bail him out, you can go down to the jail, pay the $1000, and he's free. Then you will get the $1000 back when Fred shows up to court. But if you don't have the $1000, you call a bail bondsman. You give him $100 and sign some paperwork, and then HE goes to the jail and gets Fred out. He pays the $100 (that you gave him), and signs some stuff promising to cough up the other $900 if Fred doesn't show up on his court date. So fast forward to Fred's court date. Fred shows up. At that point, the bond is exonerated, and he gets the $100 back. So now the bail bondsman has $100 in his pocket. HE gets it back. YOU don't.
The $50K/$500K is exactly the same. The bail bondsman does get the $50K back if Casey shows up on her court date. Whoever gave the bail bondsman the $50K does not get it back from the bail bondsman. Or if two people gave two bondsmen $25K apiece, it still works the same. The $50K gets refunded, and each bondsman would keep $25K as his fee.
Dateline, 48 Hours - investigative news shows DO NOT PAY FOR INTERVIEWS.
It would have to be a tabloid print (like NE) or something like EXTRA, Current Affairs, etc.
Lemme tell ya, if Casey was to give an interview, anything she says can and will be used against her in a court of law. It's not a smart move at all. Ditto any witnesses who are paid to be interviewed - could hurt the defense b/c they would lose all credibility due to questions being raised about "financial incentive".
Just makes no sense that a defense lawyer would allow it knowing the can of worms that would surely be opened.
Isn't it peculiar that Casey doesn't know where Casey is but George knows enough to have people watching the kidnappers ? This woman doesn't not deserve to have any civil rights since she tramples on everyone elses. I guess she is the only person in this case with any rights. I hope NO security is provided and she is handed over to the wolves. I hope whoever, put up this money looses all $500,0-00 of their money ande then comes public about how they have made a mistake. This yo-yo ing has GOST TO STOP.s
Tiricia is only using ads to pay for the huge bill this site has to cost. She refuses to ask for donations. I would much rather see an ad than have this site not be here any more. I am sure she has expenses for her own family she has to pay. No I will not be boycotting this site. She is doing what she has to do to keep this board open.
puhhllllllllleesssssssssssssssssssseeeeeeeee do that. I will call the head of the company!if they were dumb enough to think it could not be traced back, yes, i do.
I already know the name of the production company, if i can confirm the tie, i'll post it absolutely.
Let's say we knew who was behind the underwriting of said Bonds, and even though they posted it as a "production company" and not the network, but it could be proven it had ties to said Network and or show...
Would you boycott??? Remind you of another shadyazz deal that almost went through before the public went BIZZ- ERK.. Anyone?
Cindy has already been on Access Hollywood and another tabloid television program.
I know they pay.
O.J. did that book from prison of letters people sent him while he was in jail before his trial. It was in collaberation with Schiller.
I don't remember the name of it.
I have idea what money making thing is being plotted out by whom...but from lawyers to the tabloids there are people willing to toady to Cindy's fantasies for sales & ratings.
IMO
over $1,000.00 per month to keep it running and
you do what you gotta do.Ads are the thing these days if you want to make it.