Just thinking outside the box here, but what if the "interview" was part of a plan intended to have the AZ charges against EJ dropped, so that SA can then step in and file a murder indictment against her - hoping that when finally facing the death penalty, she will tell EVERY detail....
Just a thought....
I dunno, w/o a body, and murder evidence, can they just charge her with murder?
My thought was this, was this detective in love with her and wanted to help her go free by intentionally violating these rules? I can't imagine WHY else on earth he'd do this, given he's in LE. Did he really mean it that he's her "friend" and wanted to help her, and this is how he is going to help her get out?
Also, even if the detective did violate certain rules, WHY would this end in EJ's kidnapping charges being dropped? Did she NOT kidnap Gabrile and possibly kill him? I mean, why does GABRIEL end up paying for it when the detective made a legal error? Why does Elizabeth go FREE if the detective made a legal error? Punish the detective or void the evidence from the interview?
It is SO bizarre to me that this would be a possible outcome.
would someone please explain WHY an error of the detective, would result in EJ being freed and GABRIEL getting no justice for being missing or dead? Why does the detective's mistake make EJ's actions OKAY?
1 more thing - I wonder WHY is this coming out only now? i remember a while back, when EJ wanted to fire Alcock, she said that her grandma had paid them 50k (?) or something because they promised they'd get her off on a procedural error but that never happened. i guess this is what she is talking about... i don't recall where i saw it, does anyone have the link? Is this Alcock's strategy to protect his own reputation, or a timed attempt to save EJ after the insanity plea did not work out?