joypath
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 1,667
- Reaction score
- 858
i do wonder that and i am still trying to wrap my head around it - did the experts go home and read everything and realize they were wrong, or did they go on the stand and say what they did because they are under the jodi spell and will just say what ever they need to get her acquitted - i just don't understand at all
:twocents::twocents::twocents:
My experience: In the beginning of one's career, read & watch "stuff" and REACT in private....further down the line, LEARN from the experience by sharing it with colleagues, READ & IMPROVE presentation techniques, and move on to the next (at least in my field) never-ending case.
The honest "expert" is NOT suppose to "doctor" the TRUTH, however he/she may present a secondary often conflicting opinion to another "expert". BUT as I quote my boss :floorlaugh:, "ya betta be able to stand by your opinion with FACTS."
:floorlaugh: PS: boss also says "STAY AWAY from the media, the camera adds 10 lbs & the recording subtracts I.Q. points!" :floorlaugh: