sunshineray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 8,111
- Reaction score
- 62,839
Was the scuffle described, who it involved?YouTuber and defense witness, Rick Snay, was involved in a scuffle and kicked out of court house! Unbelievable.
Was the scuffle described, who it involved?YouTuber and defense witness, Rick Snay, was involved in a scuffle and kicked out of court house! Unbelievable.
Hope whomever was involved gets charged with contempt.So they’ve started taking the trash out.
Shameful.
Wonder if their game plan incorporates defense witnesses getting kicked out of the courthouse?from RA's appellate attorneys: in the event anyone wondered who/what is waiting in the wings related to contempt hearing
Hennessy is the one who put Snay on their witness list lol.from RA's appellate attorneys: in the event anyone wondered who/what is waiting in the wings related to contempt hearing
Noe & Greeno - YT'ers perhaps?Who the heck is "Knowy" (phonetic) that got to stay?
I would hope so.Wonder if their game plan incorporates defense witnesses getting kicked out of the courthouse?
It's their job.They are all so proud of themselves. On alert like attack dogs, what an exciting and fun day for them.
Working hard to circumvent justice and keep this case from going to trial. We wouldn’t want people actually hearing all the evidence.
It’s just a game to them.
And Libby and Abby are still dead.
Luke Nicholas
·
Mar 17, 2024
@CuriousLuke93x
·
Follow
@Wienekelo I hope you and Hennessy have looked into Habeas Corpus procedures at the SCOINBest wishes for the team tomorrow.
Wieneke Law Office, LLC
@Wienekelo
·
Follow
Michael Ausbrook, also on the case, is not attending the hearing tomorrow in order to file something if needed. He and I have a game plan in place, depending on what happens.
6:28 PM · Mar 17, 2024
Seems to me he's made his point.Hennessy is the one who put Snay on their witness list lol.
Is it?It's their job.
Being?Seems to me he's made his point.
yes. Wieneke/Ausbrook = RA's appellate team.Is it?
Right but this business concerns contempt charges for RA's defense attorney's actions, not the deliverance of RA from his possible conviction appeal in the future. So why are they on the ready today?yes. Wieneke/Ausbrook = RA's appellate team.
If RA's counsel are removed today, Cara/Ausbrook here indicate they will immediately plead to the SCOIN and/or bring an interlocutory appeal process (such as habeus corpus) at the higher court. Ausbrook wrote the memo to Judge Gull arguing that this Contempt hearing could NOT be held under RA's case in Judge Gull's court; special prosecutor must be used, wrong venue, wrong process etc.. Cara W filed/managed the 1st and 2nd Writs at the SCOIN in November, wrong process, etc.
However, it's hard to believe the resolution would be to remove the D given we're in speedy trial land now and that sort of decision would be a choice to harm RA and delay his trial ... when the Court has many other choices at her disposal should she find the D in contempt ... and the SCOIN has already pointed this out in their Decision.
JMHO
Yes it's a three-ring circus and all the performers want in.yes. Wieneke/Ausbrook = RA's appellate team.
If RA's counsel are removed today, Cara/Ausbrook here indicate they will immediately plead to the SCOIN and/or bring an interlocutory appeal process (such as habeus corpus) at the higher court. Ausbrook wrote the memo to Judge Gull arguing that this Contempt hearing could NOT be held under RA's case in Judge Gull's court; special prosecutor must be used, wrong venue, wrong process etc.. Cara W filed/managed the 1st and 2nd Writs at the SCOIN in November, wrong process, etc.
However, it's hard to believe the resolution would be to remove the D given we're in speedy trial land now and that sort of decision would be a choice to harm RA and delay his trial ... when the Court has many other choices at her disposal should she find the D in contempt ... and the SCOIN has already pointed this out in their Decision.
JMHO
Far too much critical early taped evidence has been lost by investigators in this investigation; puts McL/State in an unnecessarily vulnerable position here. Very serious; perilous stuff for the State. JMHO
That's what I was thinking,--They may have them and just not come across them yet? I just thought of another possible scenario. Maybe the replacements/old attorneys may have misplaced stuff...before returning it to AB&BR, after the SC ruled them back in the driver's seat? It's possible, JMO