This last hearing, IMO, has put a spotlight on a real problem going forward: no cameras, no recordings, no live tweets, no transcripts, no nothin'. I don't give a crap what some MSM journalist, podcaster, YouTuber, or anyone else states was said in that courtroom, because they all report something different, based on their own notes, with sometimes conflicting information, and undoubtedly biased one way or another. What are any of us supposed to do with that?
There are accusations that many of the people reporting on the hearings, or local attorneys who try to explain the law via SM, are only in it for the clicks and money. Well, unfortunately, that's all we got. How else are we supposed to find out what happened? It breeds conspiracy and hate, IMO, and the fault rests with the Court's decision to keep everything invisible. There's a reason the SCOIN records every single session and has it freely accessible on their website, both current and archived, and I hope JG keeps this in mind before the trial.
JMO.
There are accusations that many of the people reporting on the hearings, or local attorneys who try to explain the law via SM, are only in it for the clicks and money. Well, unfortunately, that's all we got. How else are we supposed to find out what happened? It breeds conspiracy and hate, IMO, and the fault rests with the Court's decision to keep everything invisible. There's a reason the SCOIN records every single session and has it freely accessible on their website, both current and archived, and I hope JG keeps this in mind before the trial.
JMO.
Last edited: