grannygates
On Time Out
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 1,379
- Reaction score
- 8,682
In all fairness, according to DD, Richard Allen Whiteman was at the trial between the hours of 1:30-3:30. If there’s errors in the name, there could be errors elsewhere. That’s why LE should be video/audio recording everything. During the actual video recorded interview, RA says he left at 1:30 and his car is seen on the HH video driving towards his house at 1:27.https://www.scribd.com/document/611146469/Unsealed-Probable-Cause-Affidavit-Richard-Allen-Delphi
There is quite a bit of circumstancal evidence.
A few things to remember:
.
RA originally placed himself on the trail from 1:30 until 3,:30.
He saw a group of girls on his way to walk on the high bridge as the group was departing. The left at approximately 1:30.
RA describes himself wearing the same clothes that BG wore that day.
He has no alibi that proves his changing statement that he departed earlier than originally stated.
His gun has a ballistic match to the round that was discovered between 3 dead girls. This is a gun that he has adamantly stated was never loaned out to anyone.
While this information may not feel compelling, if someone takes even just this SMALL tidbit of information, it is powerful.
How many grown men, wearing the same clothing, walked that trail at those exact times and had THEIR bullet from their gun found at the crime scene?
This is only the tip of the iceberg for the public IMO.
He has made repeated confessions to many people.
Circumstancal evidence still wins many cases. TV shows have us believing that a crime cannot be proven without DNA and/or fingerprints. And...I am willing to bet that a bombshell could be dropped during trial. Of course, that is my only.
AJMO
https://www.scribd.com/document/611146469/Unsealed-Probable-Cause-Affidavit-Richard-Allen-Delphi![]()
Unsealed Probable Cause Affidavit - Richard Allen, Delphi | PDF | Arrest Warrant | Probable Cause
Unsealed Probable Cause Affidavit - Richard Allen, Delphiwww.scribd.com
IMO The PCA witness statements are piecemealed to fit TLs decided narrative. The 4 girls was changed to 3, BB says she saw a 20 year old with poofy hair and a mercury comet, SC says she saw a muddy man in a tan jacket. That’s all omitted/changed to force the PCA.
So I do agree if you manipulate the witness statements like TL did, you could work a way to circumstantially put RA there. But if we are looking at direct evidence, JH and TL have stated under oath there is none.
All MOO