grannygates
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 1,281
- Reaction score
- 8,383
This motion goes into detail about the funding issues plaguing the defense. They’re having to pay out of pocket for all their expenses, experts, assistants and then just hope the court will ever reimburse them. The court was over 5 months overdue in paying the attorneys legal fees at the time of writing this motion, so basically the defense team is paying to represent RA. MOO
Meanwhile, according to this motion, the prosecution had just hired 3 new experts, apparently right after the judge denied the defense any funding to keep the experts on that they already had. The judge even denied the defense hiring a forensic pathologist. IMO We see those like every trial.
Apparently this is all detailed in the judges order dated March 7,2024, but I haven’t been able to find it yet?
It does scream unfair that the prosecution gets unlimited resources and the defense has to pay for the trial out of their own pocket. It really doesn’t affect me if someone wants to donate their money towards the goal of a fair trial. I don’t see why people care.
acrobat.adobe.com
Meanwhile, according to this motion, the prosecution had just hired 3 new experts, apparently right after the judge denied the defense any funding to keep the experts on that they already had. The judge even denied the defense hiring a forensic pathologist. IMO We see those like every trial.
Apparently this is all detailed in the judges order dated March 7,2024, but I haven’t been able to find it yet?
It does scream unfair that the prosecution gets unlimited resources and the defense has to pay for the trial out of their own pocket. It really doesn’t affect me if someone wants to donate their money towards the goal of a fair trial. I don’t see why people care.